Before reading this article, please click "Follow" so that it is convenient for you to discuss and share, and at the same time, it can also make you feel a different sense of participation, thank you very much for your support!
On July 4, some 63 lawmakers sent a joint letter to Israeli Speaker Amir, demanding a declaratory debate and a vote against Palestinian statehood.
This move has undoubtedly plunged the already complicated Palestinian-Israeli situation into a deeper whirlpool.
Sudden plans for statehood
The letter was initiated by the leaders of the Land Caucus in the Knesset, including parliamentarians Edelstein (Likud), Rothman (Religious Zionist Party) and Hamelec (Unity Zionist Party), among others.
These names may not be "one family" in Israel's political arena, but their joint action has focused the world's attention on them.
Let's start with Yuli Edelstein, a member of the Likud party who has always been known for his hard-line stance on Israel's political scene.
The Likud Party, a party with significant influence in Israeli politics, has long been quite resolute on the Palestinian-Israeli issue.
And Yuli Edelstein's participation in this action is undoubtedly a continuation of the Likud party's usual style.
He may believe that resolute opposition to Palestinian statehood is a necessary means of safeguarding Israel's national security and interests.
But can such resoluteness really bring lasting peace and stability to Israel? This is a question worth pondering.
Speaking of Simcha Rothman, who comes from the Religious Zionist Party, the religious factor behind it may have also played a significant role in this operation.
Religious beliefs often influence a person's political views and action decisions, but for Simcha Rothman, how much influence does religion have?
Was he purely religious, or did he have deeper political agendas? It's all hidden in the fog.
There is also Limore Song Hamelec, whose participation as a representative of the United Zionist Party has made the coalition more diverse.
What was his motivation? Is it for partisan gain, or does it genuinely believe that opposition to Palestinian statehood is in the interest of Israel's future?
The joint action of these 63 parliamentarians seems to be menacing, but can they really achieve their goals?
You must know that the issue of Palestinian statehood is not only an internal political game in Israel, but also involves the extensive attention and interests of the international community.
The international community has been committed to promoting the Palestinian-Israeli peace process and hopes to resolve the dispute between Palestine and Israel through peaceful negotiations.
And the actions of these 63 parliamentarians are undoubtedly contrary to the mainstream will of the international community.
From a historical point of view, the conflict between Palestine and Israel has a long history.
Over the years, numerous peace agreements and negotiation attempts have failed to resolve the issue once and for all.
And this time, will the hardline attitude of the Israeli parliamentarians further worsen the Palestinian-Israeli situation? Will it trigger greater conflict and instability? It's like an unknown hanging over people's minds, and it's worrying.
Let us imagine what the fate of the Palestinian people would be if Israel were to resolutely oppose Palestinian statehood. Will their struggle be more intense?
And what kind of international pressure and public condemnation will Israel itself face? In today's globalized world, the behavior of any country cannot exist in isolation, and will be scrutinized and judged by the international community.
Controversy after the letter
The letter, written by the Knesset, clearly and firmly expresses strong opposition to the establishment of a Palestinian State west of the Jordan River.
Why would parliament be so vocal in its opposition to this idea? The reason behind this is by no means simple.
From the point of view of Israeli national security, this move is considered a potentially huge threat.
Imagine whether the management and control of a newly established state, under the interweaving of complex geopolitical and ethno-religious factors, can reach a level of stability and effectiveness?
If good governance is not achieved, will it become a breeding ground for terrorists? This is not alarmist, as similar situations have been repeated throughout history.
Terrorists, the term that makes people smell so bad, once they find a foothold in this land, the consequences are unimaginable.
They may take advantage of the relatively weak security line here to plan and carry out a series of terrorist activities, which will deal a devastating blow to the peace and tranquility of Israel and the entire region.
For example, in some areas, due to the instability and lack of management, terrorist groups have risen rapidly, causing countless bloody attacks and plunging the local people into endless fear and suffering.
Let's talk about the issues mentioned in this joint letter that could lead to the exacerbation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
For many years, the contradictions between Israel and Palestine have been deeply rooted, and the slightest disturbance may trigger a fierce confrontation.
Support for the establishment of a Palestinian State is, in the eyes of some, undoubtedly adding fuel to the fire of an already tense situation.
Let us recall past Israeli-Palestinian conflicts, each of which has resulted in huge casualties and property damage.
Houses are destroyed, innocent people are displaced, children lose the joy of childhood, and only fear and confusion are left in their eyes.
Once a Palestinian state is established here, new territorial disputes, resource allocation, and other issues will inevitably ensue, further intensifying the contradictions between the two sides.
Moreover, the intensification of this conflict is by no means confined to the Israeli and Palestinian sides.
The security situation in the entire Middle East region could be implicated.
The Middle East is a place full of entanglements of interests and contradictions, and relations between countries are complicated.
The escalation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is likely to upset the existing regional balance and trigger a chain reaction.
Just like the domino effect, once the first card falls, the subsequent cards fall in turn, creating unpredictable and uncontrollable chaos.
Neighboring countries may be drawn into it, and the originally relatively stable regional order will be completely broken, economic development will be hindered, and social unrest will be unstable.
One might ask, is it not possible to resolve this issue through peaceful negotiations and consultations? The ideal is plump, but the reality is skinny.
The differences between the two sides on many core issues are huge, and the possibility of reaching a consensus in the short term is slim.
In the face of such a grim situation, we should not just sit back and talk about it, but also actively seek solutions.
The international community should play a more active role in bringing the two sides back to the negotiating table to resolve disputes in a peaceful, just and reasonable manner.
Only in this way can real peace and hope be brought to this war-torn land.
(Only published on the headline account, other platforms are ported)
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance.
If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any suspicious part of the incident, delete or change it immediately after contacting!