On July 4, Beijing time, the Chinese men's basketball team practiced in Australia and ushered in the second warm-up game with the Australian team. In the first game, the Chinese team lost 87-107, and the disparity in strength was obvious. In this game, both sides sent their main lineups, hoping to regain the rhythm and confidence of the game.
At the beginning of the game, the Chinese men's basketball team played against the Australian team again, but failed to change the decline of the previous game. Netizens' comments on the game reflected the true face of the game: Australia quickly opened the game to a 3-0 lead, to which the Chinese team relied on the combined score of Liao Sanning and Yang Hansen to respond. However, the subsequent development of this game did not go as expected. The Australian team gradually widened the gap in the score, and at the end of the first quarter, the Chinese team fell behind with a score gap of 10-21, and the disadvantage on the court was obvious.
Entering the second quarter, the Chinese team tried to narrow the gap through the outstanding performances of players such as Liao Sanning and Wang Lanyan, but in the face of the strong defense and accurate shooting rate of the Australian team, they still struggled to form an effective counterattack. At halftime, the Chinese team fell behind again 24-38, and this time the gap was enough to make fans worried.
In the second half of the game, the Chinese team continued to look for opportunities to counterattack. The excellent performances of He Xining and Yang Hansen gave a glimmer of hope to the team, and their attacking and defensive qualities were revealed. However, the Aussies did not let up their grip on the game, and they continued to hold on to their lead with excellent outside shooting and solid defense. As the game entered the final quarter, the situation of the Chinese team became clearer, and their score deficit became more and more irretrievable. In the end, the Chinese team ended in a 39-79 defeat, and the result of this game undoubtedly disappointed and frustrated fans and spectators.
For the Chinese men's basketball team, the defeat in this game once again exposed the gap between them and the world's top teams. Although some of the players in the team performed well, such as Liao Sanning's outstanding performance in attack and He Xining's all-out defence, overall, they still had to face technical and tactical shortcomings. The post-match comments and analysis fully illustrate the fans' concerns about the future development of the team, and they want to see more progress and improvement to achieve better results in the upcoming matches.
Du Runwang and Gao Shiyan are members of the national team, and their performances have indeed failed to meet expectations in the eyes of some fans. Du Runwang is tall and well-rounded, but in recent games, his performance has really not fully met expectations. Gao Shiyan is a young and promising player with solid skills, but his role and performance in the national team are also questionable. The performances of these two players in the national team seem to be out of touch with the quality they have shown at the club.
At the same time, netizens mentioned Jiang Yuxing and Jiang Weize of the Jilin team. These two players have really been impressive this season. Kang Yuxing, as the team's scoring champion, averages more than 20 points per game, and his explosiveness and shooting accuracy in the game make him an indispensable part of the team. Kang, on the other hand, is a versatile player who not only excels on the scoring end, but also shows excellent ability in defense and playmaking. Their performance on the field not only won the applause of the fans, but also made people wonder if they should have the opportunity to enter the national team and win glory for the country.
However, this similar controversy over the selection of candidates is not a temporary event. In the world of sports, especially in the selection of national teams, there are often controversies and discussions of one kind or another. Fans' expectations and evaluations of players often vary based on personal preferences and perceptions, sometimes leading to public debates and conflicts. For players like Du Runwang and Gao Shiyan, they not only need to face the pressure of the arena, but also have to endure doubts and challenges from the outside world. This is especially true for young players, who need to stay calm and focused under such pressure, and constantly improve their technical skills and game experience.
In the selection and formation of the national team, the coaching staff often takes into account many factors of the players, including technical strength, game experience, psychological quality and so on. Choosing which player to play with the national team is not a single decision, but requires weighing various factors and considering the interests of the whole. Therefore, although there are sometimes cases where rookies like Kang Woo-sung and Kang We-taek fail to be selected due to their outstanding performances, this does not mean that there is a problem with the selection mechanism of the national team, but it reflects the rigor and fairness of the selection.
After the game, each player was rated for their performance. Liao Sanning was consistent throughout the match, and his contribution should not be underestimated. He has shown his ability and experience on both the defensive and offensive ends. His outstanding performance earned the team valuable points.
In stark contrast to Liao Sanning are players such as Du Runwang and Li Hongquan. Their performance in the game did not meet expectations and did not contribute points to the team. Du Runwang's performance on the field was a little weak, and there were some mistakes in technical movements, which had a certain impact on the team's overall attack. Li Hongquan did not perform well on the defensive end, and the opponent frequently found opportunities to attack, resulting in some points conceded.
In addition to these players, there are also some other players who have their own performances. For example, Wang Lanyan's breakthrough and passing in the game showed excellent skills. Her energy and determination on the pitch has added a number of attacking options to the team. He Xining made some key interceptions and steals on the defensive end, limiting the opponent's scoring opportunities.
The post-match rating is not just based on the score, but more about the overall performance of the players in the game. Every player's contribution is indispensable, both offensively and defensively. On the basis of teamwork, every player is trying to play their part and try to get every point for the team. This spirit of solidarity is an important guarantee for the team to be able to win.
Of course, there will be winners and losers in every game. Although some players have not performed as well as they should, that doesn't mean they haven't put in the effort in training and preparation. Each player has taken solid steps on the path of continuous improvement and growth, and their hard work and dedication cannot be measured by a simple scoreline.
The post-match score rating also reflects the coaching staff's objective view of the players' performance. Based on each player's performance in the game, they will work out the next step in training and adjustments. This individualized assessment helps players better identify their shortcomings and perform better in the following games.
Throughout the game, although the Chinese men's basketball team showed some bright spots, there was still a big gap between the overall strength and the Australian team. In the future, the team needs to further strengthen tactical adjustments and individual technical training in order to achieve better results in the next games.
Welcome to leave your valuable comments and opinions in the comment area, and look forward to discussing with you.
Note: It is not easy to be original, plagiarism and manuscript washing, and it will be studied deeply. The picture comes from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete