Before reading this article, please click "Follow" so that it is convenient for you to discuss and share, and at the same time, it can also make you feel a different sense of participation, thank you very much for your support!
Recently, the news that actor Wang Yan's son Wang Hongqin was sent to Peking University as a basketball specialty has set off storms on the Internet.
This incident quickly became the focus of heated public discussion, and all kinds of doubts were heard.
Wang Hongqin, this name was mentioned by countless people overnight.
He passed the high-level athlete examination recognized by Peking University, and according to the regulations, he only needs to reach the provincial undergraduate general admission score of 434 points to enter the school gate of Peking University.
It was this seemingly "easy" access condition that caused an uproar.
The fog behind the escort
The first focus was on his basketball prowess.
In the passionate and competitive field of basketball, strength is the measure of everything.
But can Wang Hongqin's performance really be called a high-level athlete? Netizens have turned over his scoring data, and those inconspicuous numbers seem to tell a suspicious story.
For example, in some key matches, he even has a record of 0 points.
This begs the question, how can such a feat match the title of a high-level athlete?
Let's take a look at some of the real basketball pros.
Like Yao Ming, every time he scored on the court and every rebound he scrambled, he showed excellent strength and skills.
And Wang Hongqin's performance is really far from these basketball superstars.
It's no wonder that netizens will strongly question his basketball skills.
Is he really a master of the overlooked skills, or is there some hidden secret behind it? It's all like a fog that hangs over the public's mind, waiting to be revealed.
Controversy over the controversy
The incident of Wang Hongqin's escort to Peking University has caused an uproar on the Internet, like a menacing storm, which continues to rage, and the discussion heat caused by it is higher and higher.
The experts couldn't hold back and stepped into this "battlefield" of public opinion one after another.
Some experts claim that substitutes also have the opportunity to win the honour of high-level athletes.
This seems to provide a plausible argument for the heated debate, but it backfires, and the public skepticism has not only not died down, but has only intensified.
This so-called explanation, in the eyes of everyone, is like a fig leaf full of loopholes, which not only fails to cover up the problem, but makes everyone feel more and more that it is greasy and unfair.
In the hearts of the public, the real high-level athletes should be those who dominate the arena and make significant contributions to the team with their outstanding performance.
They are like warriors on the battlefield, charging into battle, writing glory with strength and sweat.
But look at Wang Hongqin, the score in the game is actually a dazzling 0 points!
How can this not put a big question mark on the authenticity of his qualification as a national first-class athlete?
You know, in today's society, injustice is like a ghost, popping up from time to time.
In the field of education, every opportunity to go on to higher education is like a precious treasure, and everyone is doing their best to fight for it under the rules of fairness and justice.
There are always some discordant notes that break the peace that it should be.
For example, the children of some powerful people can easily obtain high-quality educational resources by virtue of their special relationships;
Or, some "special students" who are not worthy of the name have stepped into the ideal university through improper means.
These phenomena, like sharp thorns, are deeply rooted in people's hearts, making everyone's desire for fairness and justice more and more intense.
Wang Hongqin's incident touched the sensitive nerve of the public in this context.
One can't help but ask: what exactly did he get qualified for?
Is it really a great sporting talent, or is there a secret behind it? If it's the former, how can his 0-point performance be explained?
If it is the latter, then what is the intricate chain of interests hidden behind it?
Let's assume that if Wang Hongqin really relied on his own strength to qualify for the escort, was his abnormal performance in the game just an accident? Or was it because of the competition environment, physical condition, and other special reasons?
But if not, who is behind it? How can they be so bold under heavy supervision?
Think about it, how unfair this is to those athletes who really work the field!
They train hard day in and day out, sweating and suffering from injuries just to be able to show their style on the field and earn a bright future for themselves.
And Wang Hongqin, just because of a highly questionable escort qualification, easily got the opportunity they dreamed of, which made those who worked hard, how embarrassed?
Imagine how unfair it would be for those candidates who worked hard to get a high score through improper means in an important exam.
In the same way, in the field of sports, if someone obtains honors and opportunities through black-box operations, it is not a huge harm to those athletes who really love sports and sweat for their dreams?
For example, in the once sensational fraud incident of a sports event, an athlete won a medal by cheating, and was finally revealed, not only discredited, but also severely punished.
It also makes people more sensitive to the fairness of sporting events.
Wang Hongqin's escort incident, is there a similar trick hidden? This is the biggest question on everyone's mind.
The search for fairness and truth
In this storm of public opinion, Peking University's attitude and measures have attracted much attention.
Peking University has always had extremely strict requirements for the recruitment of athletes, candidates need to pass the national unified test, and the test process is monitored and videotaped to ensure fairness and authenticity.
This series of measures should be a powerful means to ensure the fairness and transparency of the recruitment process.
But did these measures really work in the case of Wang Hongqin? The public is waiting for a clear answer.
Perhaps, we should believe that Peking University's recruitment mechanism is rigorous, and believe that they can give a convincing explanation.
But doubts will not cease until the truth is known.
Fairness is the cornerstone of society and the expectation of everyone.
We look forward to seeing true fairness and justice in this matter.
Whether Wang Hongqin did rely on his own strength to obtain the qualification for escort, or whether there was unfair behavior in it, there should be a clear and clear conclusion.
(Only published on the headline account, other platforms are ported)
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance.
If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any suspicious part of the incident, delete or change it immediately after contacting!