From the perspective of personal interests, I have been focusing on three things recently: one is the Russia-Ukraine war and the situation in the Middle East; One is whether the U.S. moon landing was real or not; One is the dynamics and rights and wrongs of the cross talk circle.
Because I like and pay attention to these things, I have also come into contact with and become familiar with many anchors in these fields on the Internet. I have a general impression of this, that is, the relative level of the anchors in the cross talk circle is very inferior, especially those anchors who scold Guo Degang all day long, which are so low-level that it is disgusting.
As far as the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are concerned, I think the streamers in this field are not only professional, but also very dedicated, especially their follow-up and update speed is amazing.
As we all know, the situation and dynamics of war are changing rapidly. The day before yesterday and yesterday's events may become old news today, and there is no practical significance, so on the whole, the follow-up speed of these anchors can be called superb.
For example, an hour after an incident occurs, their analysis and judgment can be seen on the Internet. Content aside, their dedication alone is admirable.
As for whether the moon landing in the United States was fake, in fact, this is an unresolved question that has not yet been resolved. No matter what positions and opinions the anchors in this area adhere to, they need to output a lot of professional arguments and arguments, which requires a wealth of aerospace knowledge and logical thinking.
Personally, I have my own opinion on whether the moon landing was fake. But I also think that people who hold the opposite view of me, they are also justified. Therefore, their professional output, whether it is the same as mine or not, is worthy of my personal learning and reference.
Looking back at these anchors in the cross talk circle, their performance can be described as boring and boring. Especially those gangsters who scold Guo Degang all day long, they can be said to be both unprofessional (they never talk about Guo Degang's specific works) and immoral.
From an objective point of view, it is no problem to support or oppose Lao Guo, but as an anchor of the quyi track, you must adhere to objectivity and rationality, and your words are well-founded.
And those who scold Lao Guo all day long often use slander, framing, and rumors to support their views. Even some anchors licked their faces and went to the theater to deliberately pose for scenes in some special periods, and turned around to scold Deyun Club and Guo Degang, it can be said that there is no lower limit to ethics.
There are also people who chew some old things two or three times a day. For example, some rights and wrongs between Guo Degang and his teacher Yang Zhigang have been chewing for several years or more than ten years. Including after the old gentleman became deceased, they still clung to this bone tightly, and it was really ugly to eat.
Personally, I think that compared with military anchors and aerospace anchors, those anchors who scolded Lao Guo are not only of low level, but also very lacking in morality and morality.