Recently, a rights protection incident involving merchants using "ghost scales" to cause customers to be deceived has attracted widespread attention in Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province. The incident originated when a blogger found that the weight was insufficient after purchasing goods in the direct sales market, and was besieged by the merchant, and even the market management took the side of the merchant, which further escalated and led to the robbery of the blogger's mobile phone.
Subsequently, the relevant video broke the news on the Internet, but the local officials in Lianyungang turned off the comment function. The handling of this incident and the subsequent public repercussions reflect that the mainland people still face certain challenges in protecting their rights and making information open and transparent.
The reason for the incident is simple. A blogger went to the Lianyungang seafood and vegetable direct sales market to shop and bought a pound of climbing shrimp from one of the merchants, but later he used the scale to find that he was missing half a catty and lost more than 30 yuan. Any consumer will be dissatisfied in this situation, so he will go to the merchant to get compensation or exchange.
Loading...
However, things didn't go the way he imagined. According to the video, after a quarrel with the blogger, the female boss of the merchant directly tore up the packaging bag and threw away the shrimp, obviously trying to erase the transaction evidence.
Soon, other onlookers and market managers joined in. What's even more surprising is that instead of mediating the dispute from the standpoint of fairness and justice, they surrounded the blogger and helped the female merchant hide the weighing scale by illegal means, in an attempt to continue to cover up the truth.
Seeing this, the blogger said that he would find the management department to deal with it according to the law, and he thought that they would perform their management duties responsibly. But unfortunately, the management is on the side of the merchant, and someone even directly snatched the mobile phone from which he took the video, wanting to completely bury the incident.
Neither the management nor the merchant apologized for his mistakes, nor did they make any compensation or promise to face up to their mistakes, but continued to chase and obstruct the blogger's behavior to report to his superiors, and the incident almost turned into a vicious circle and illegal acts that violated personal privacy.
The escalation of the situation clearly goes beyond the scope of ordinary economic disputes, and is full of power games and collective nepotism. This has seriously affected the basic trading rights of the masses and the principle of information openness and transparency. Among them, the failure of the management as a mediator and supervisor is the main reason for the expansion of the incident.
Afterwards, the blogger did not give up, and he uploaded the video taken of the whole process of the dispute to the Internet, which attracted widespread attention. Many local consumers have also come forward to accuse that similar scams have occurred in the same market.
Despite the spread of the incident, local government agencies and state media have responded by blocking information, such as shutting down comments and deleting public opinion posts. At a time when proactive communication should have been taken, it has only deepened the people's doubts about the lack of sincerity of the authorities.
Mere individual disputes should not escalate to the nature of bullying. However, as netizens said, if the management department can face the problem in a timely manner and in accordance with the law with a sense of responsibility, investigate and collect evidence as soon as possible to obtain the truth, announce the handling decision, and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of all parties, the incident will also end.
On the contrary, due to their irresponsible handling and subsequent blocking of information, it has directly led to the accumulation of public opinion doubts and dissatisfaction, making this matter a scrutiny and examination of the entire public power and the way it operates.
In today's open and transparent information, the masses have enough judgment ability to distinguish between right and wrong. If the authorities want to eliminate their demands, they should listen to the opinions of the people with the utmost sincerity and make authoritative and fair decisions. The issue should not be avoided by blocking information, which is as important as upholding social justice and fairness.
It is necessary to comprehensively investigate the truth from the standpoint of citizens and earnestly protect the legitimate rights and interests of each and every one of the masses. Only in this way can all parties in society truly reach trust and consensus, and the incident can be best resolved.