On May 15th, the battle of the CBA Finals G1 was rekindled in a warm atmosphere. The Xinjiang men's basketball team challenged the Liaoning men's basketball team away, and the players from both sides launched a fierce competition on the court. However, in this seemingly ordinary game, there are a lot of waves and controversies hidden, which make fans question the results of the game and the referee's decision.
At the beginning of the game, the Liaoning men's basketball team showed strong offensive firepower. In particular, the performances of Zhang Zhenlin and Zhao Jiwei made the fans shine. Zhang Zhenlin hit consecutive three-pointers in the first quarter of the game, opening up the score gap for the Liaoning men's basketball team. Zhao Jiwei, on the other hand, relied on his excellent organizational skills and passing vision to create offensive opportunities for the team again and again. Under the leadership of the two, the Liaoning men's basketball team led the Xinjiang men's basketball team by as many as 16 points in the first quarter, allowing fans to see their determination and strength to impact the championship. The Xinjiang men's basketball team did not give up because of this. They gradually regained their form in the following games, especially in the third quarter, when they chased the deficit to nine points at one point. However, at this critical moment, a controversial penalty disrupted the momentum of the Xinjiang men's basketball team.
Xinjiang men's basketball foreign aid Wei Kington was strictly defended by the Liaoning men's basketball team in an attack. In the fierce confrontation, Wiggington appeared to be a little emotionally out of control and expressed dissatisfaction with the referee's decision. However, his protest was rewarded with a technical foul. This penalty dealt a big blow to the morale of the Xinjiang men's basketball team, and also made Wiggington himself feel frustrated. If Wiggington's technical foul is excusable, then what happened to Han Dejun next is even more puzzling. In an attack, Han Dejun tried to break through the opponent's defense, but was cut by the opponent. Originally, this should have been an ordinary defensive move, but Han Dejun expressed great dissatisfaction with it. He angrily expressed his displeasure to the referee, believing that the opponent had committed a foul. However, unexpectedly, the referee changed the verdict after watching the video replay and blew a foul on Xinjiang men's basketball player Wu Guanxi. This penalty allowed Han Dejun to make free throws, and it also allowed the Liaoning men's basketball team to further expand the score advantage.
The controversy doesn't end there. At another critical moment in the game, when Wu Guanxi was about to launch an attack after grabbing a rebound, he was fouled by Zhao Jiwei from behind. This obvious foul was initially ignored by the referee, and even Edison Wu was blown out of bounds. Wu was very dissatisfied with the decision, and he expressed his doubts to the referee. However, the referee did not respond in any way to this. What's even more infuriating is that Zhao Jiwei didn't look like he had committed a foul after committing a foul, and even raised his hand to indicate that it was Edison Wu who made a throw-in. This behavior is undoubtedly a provocation to the rules of the game and the authority of the referee, and it also makes fans question Zhao Jiwei's character. The controversial decision and the reaction of the players in this game undoubtedly left a deep impression on the fans. To some extent, these controversies even affected the course and outcome of the game. For the Xinjiang men's basketball team, they had the opportunity to cause some trouble for the Liaoning men's basketball team in the away challenge, but missed the opportunity due to the referee's controversial decision. For the Liaoning men's basketball team, although they eventually won the game, such a victory seemed to be a bit overwhelming.
This isn't the first time in the CBA league that there have been controversial decisions. We've seen similar scenes many times in past races. However, this does not mean that we should take it for granted or turn a blind eye to it. On the contrary, we should pay more attention to these issues and call on the league to strengthen the training and management of referees to ensure the fairness and impartiality of the game. For the fans, what they want to see is a fair, just and exciting game. They want to see the players doing their best and sweating on the field, rather than affecting the course and outcome of the game because of the referee's controversial decision. Therefore, we call on the league and the referees to pay more attention to the fairness and impartiality of the game, and present a wonderful game for the fans. As players, they should also be calm and rational in the game. No matter what the situation, you should respect the referee's decision, follow the rules of the game, and respect the opponent and the fans. Only in this way can we truly reflect the quality and demeanor of professional players.
Although the CBA Finals G1 game is over, the problems exposed in it are worthy of our deep thought and reflection. We should take this as an opportunity to strengthen the management and supervision of the league to ensure the fairness and impartiality of the competition. At the same time, we should also call on the players to pay more attention to their professionalism and moral demeanor, and present a wonderful game for the fans.