I received some messages and letters, some criticized, some admonished, and some scolded.
I understand the intentions of these netizens and friends, and I have no intention of offending you. If what words in the video in my article make you unpleasant, the first thing that should be reviewed is me.
The following understandings, incorrect, please criticize.
(1) I was shocked by these letters, because there are so many people speaking for an official who has fallen from power, which shows that he must have done a lot of things that satisfy the people, so that he can have today's result. Thank you for telling me these facts that I didn't know before.
(2) The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the State Supervision Commission took down this cadre, but did not disclose specific facts, what was the reason for Secretary Zhu's downfall, we might as well let the bullets fly for a while.
(3) Is there a possibility: he has done some useful work to change the face of Nanyang, and at the same time there is another aspect that the common people can't see and don't know? If there is only one first possibility, it is that the organization has done something wrong; If the second possibility also exists, it is entirely possible to explain the two reactions of public opinion to him today.
(4) Accusing me of falling into the ground, this may have wronged me, when Secretary Zhu was in the limelight, I criticized him three times, all because of specific things. Otherwise, there would not have been him, who mobilized a lot of connections, made a special trip to Beijing, pulled many familiar faces, invited me to dinner, and asked me to shut up.
(5) I agree with what Linjiang Diaoyue said, merit is merit, and the contribution of former Minister of Railways Liu Zhijun to the development of China's high-speed rail may be greater than that of Zhu Shixi.
(6) Governor Yan Chunfeng said that I don't know Secretary Zhu and am not qualified to comment. I should go to Nanyang to learn about the people's evaluation of Secretary Zhu. Thank you for your advice and advice, I can't do this for the time being. I have noticed the positive comments of some people, including you, on Secretary Zhu, and I have also seen the decision of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the State Supervision Commission to deal with him.
(7) I only stated the fact that Secretary Zhu sent someone to Beijing to cover my mouth, but I did not say, nor did I think that covering my mouth was the reason for his downfall.
(8) It is true that the change in the appearance of the city and the image of the city has a great relationship with the number one leader, and I believe in the facts you have stated, and I understand your eagerness to change the appearance of your hometown, but it is also possible that Comrade Zhu Shixi has corruption or other problems at the same time.
(9) Comrade Zhu Shixi has been transferred to many jobs, but it is not clear to us what post he made mistakes in which he worked. What if the problem is in Zhumadian instead of Nanyang, if he works in Nanyang, not only is there no flaw, but all of them are positive, positive, hard-working, upward, and must be fully affirmed? We can only say that it is a pity.
A strange discovery: Almost all the people who left messages praising Zhu Shixi and praising Zhu Shixi claimed to be from Nanyang, or heard from Nanyang people that Zhu Shixi was a good cadre.
This year is the third year that Zhu has worked in Nanyang from the west, and this phenomenon may prove that Zhu's achievements in Nanyang in the past three years are obvious to all, and the people have a sense of gain and agree with his work. However, at this age, there are many places where I have worked, why don't I see readers outside Nanyang, such as Zhumadian or some other places, to complain about it? How about Zhu Shixi working in other places? In the past three years, he has made achievements in his work and has been praised by some people in Nanyang, does it mean that he has no other problems in the past three years? If there have been no other problems in the past three years, can it be inferred that there were no problems in his work and life three years ago, and he could withstand the scrutiny of the organization?
It can be seen that some people have a particularly strong ability to empathize, have strong sympathy for Secretary Zhu, and have a strong hatred for Sima Nan, so they even advocate arresting Sima Nan and releasing Secretary Zhu......
If there is evidence that Sima Nan should be arrested, Secretary Zhu should be released, what you said is right, you have the right to express your opinions, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the State Supervision Commission have the power to act in accordance with laws and regulations, emotions cannot replace evidence, and the Wanmin umbrella complex cannot change the nature of the matter.
Nanyang has a long history, local opera has a wide mass base, and in the old days, the common people had the tradition of giving umbrellas to praise the virtue and politics of local officials. On the umbrella, there are many small silk strips, and the name of the giver is written on it.
In the Qing Dynasty, this custom was greatly carried forward, the magistrate left, the gentleman and businessmen in this place (note, they are all local heads and faces, not ordinary people) have to express a little retention, and later made a flourishing formalism, every time the momentum of the "Wanmin umbrella", which means that this parent official, like an umbrella to cover the people of one side, the more umbrellas sent, the more face this official has, so the face project intensifies, and it is vulgar.
Of course, it cannot be ruled out here that there are indeed good officials who practice moral government and are remembered by the people, and when this official is removed or demoted, the people are grateful for his virtue and give the people umbrellas, and even stop the sedan chair, which is the merit of good officials and clean officials, especially the expression of the people's affection and righteousness.
I sincerely believe that those readers who express nostalgia for Zhu Shixi and praise his political achievements are sincere, and even from the comparison between officials, they find that Zhu Shixi has done good things, and good officials are rare. I understand your feelings, and I have no intention of going against your feelings, but Yu Jideng said: "People see things differently, if there is disobedience, do not add guilt." I don't know if I can get your approval for this understanding.
Is it absolutely incompatible with the perception of some people as good officials and clean officials, officials who contribute to urban development, and those who violate party and government discipline and even national laws?
(On the evening of May 14, 2024, it was written at No. 8, Nanluoguxiang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, and I bought vegetables at the vegetable market on the morning of May 15, and added a few more sentences)