Recently, a man in Dalian said that he rescued three women and one man at the beach, and after releasing the rescue video, one of the rescued people asked him to delete the video, otherwise he would be warned by the report, which caused heated discussions. In this regard, on the 14th, the party Mr. Li said that he had indeed saved people, and the other party had called the police. The Xinghaiwan Branch of the Dalian Municipal Public Security Bureau responded: Someone did call the police, and Mr. Li had already made a record at the scene.
On May 11, Mr. Li from Dalian posted a video saying he had rescued three women and a man at the beach and was happy for himself. Unexpectedly, the video caused him trouble, "The rescued person called the police." This matter has sparked heated discussions.
The video taken by Mr. Li shows that the sea is very windy and rough at night, and there are faint figures on the reef, accompanied by screams. The camera flipped, and his clothes, pants, and shoes were all wet. Mr. Li's copywriter wrote, "I went fishing in Xinghai Playground and saw four people falling into the sea, and no one went down to save them, so I jumped down and saved three women and one man." Even though I'm wet, I'm happy......"
After that, Mr. Li left a message in the comment area and asked, "At around 23 o'clock on May 10, 2024, did anyone take a specific video of this incident to help me testify, I feel very wronged, and the person concerned called the police." In the unlikely event that there is a court session in the future, I will have the evidence to defend myself. ”
The matter quickly attracted attention and controversy on the Internet, but there are still multiple questions to be answered.
01
Farmer vs. Snake or invasion of privacy?
Multiple questions to be answered
Some netizens who claimed to have been rescued denied that they committed suicide by jumping into the sea and were washed down by the waves, while her two female friends were dragging her to save her, and it was not clear whether there were bystanders involved in the rescue.
A netizen who claimed to be a girlfriend left a message saying that a man and a woman quarreled and fell into the water at the beach, and she and her sister rescued people, and Mr. Li pulled them on the top and did not go into the water. The video was published without permission, Mr. Li was contacted to delete the video without success, and the person who fell into the water was being subjected to cyberbullying.
Some netizens also believe that Mr. Li's video did not expose the names and appearance of the parties, nor did it point out the reason why several people fell into the water, and there was no infringement.
In an interview, Mr. Li said that he did save people. "There were three women and one man, three men in the sea to be exact, and one woman on a stone. At that time, the situation was very urgent, so I pulled a few people up. ”
He believes that the video is just casual and does not give any definition for the other party's overboard, and the other party can communicate well if he wants to delete the video, but he has a tough attitude and threats, which is unacceptable.
Mr. Li revealed that the other party has called the police. "The police contacted me, briefly understood the situation, and asked me to wait for the call."
On May 14, a staff member of the Xinghaiwan Branch of the Dalian Municipal Public Security Bureau said that someone had indeed called the police about the incident, "Today he (Mr. Li) came over and made a record." We'll look into it for sure. ”
02
Lawyers interpret disputes
1. Is Mr. Li's act of publishing the video infringing?
Yi Xu, a senior partner at Hunan Jinzhou Law Firm, said that on the issue of infringement, Mr. Li's actions may involve infringement of portrait rights and privacy rights. If the rescued person in the video has made it clear that he does not want his image to be made public, then Mr. Li may have violated their portrait and privacy rights by posting the video without their consent. In addition, if Mr. Li makes false statements or fabricates facts in the video, it may cause damage to the right to reputation of the rescued person.
However, in this case, netizens generally believed that the video could not see the people clearly at all, and did not say the reason why those people fell. This means that the content of the video may not be sufficient to constitute a clear violation of portrait rights, privacy rights, or reputation rights. However, whether infringement is constituted still needs to be judged according to the content of the video and the specific circumstances of the rescued person.
2. If the rescued person claims that he was cyberbullied, can he blame Mr. Li?
Yi Xu believes that the rescued should protect their rights and interests through legal channels, rather than blaming Mr. Li. If they do suffer online violence, they can complain to the platform or report it to the police. But in the process, they need to prove that the online violence is directly related to Mr. Li's actions, which is not easy to do.
3. In the face of the other party's report, can Mr. Li defend his rights?
Yi Xu believes that in the face of the other party's report to the police, Mr. Li should remain calm, actively cooperate with the police investigation, and provide video and relevant evidence. If he believes that his actions do not constitute an infringement, he can explain the situation to the police and seek legal help to protect his rights and interests. At the same time, if Mr. Li believes that the rescued person's behavior has caused him loss or distress, he can also consider defending his rights against the other party through legal channels.
Source: Xiaoxiang Morning News, Zhejiang Online