Image source network
Recently, a tragedy shocked the entire car circle and the community of camping enthusiasts - a Chengdu Great Wall Cannon car owner was unfortunately stuck in the neck while operating an electric tent on the roof, which caused widespread attention and discussion. Netizens jokingly said: This is the neck technology that the Great Wall has broken in recent years?
Image source network
According to witnesses and friends of the car owner, the tragedy occurred on May 11, the owner of the car only half a month after picking up the car, but encountered an accident when using the roof function of the Shanhaiju rooftop tent. Despite attempts by others around them, including crowbars and chainsaws, they were unable to save their lives.
Image source network
After 120 emergency personnel arrived at the scene, they carried out rescue for more than 20 minutes, but unfortunately, their lives were still not saved.
Image source network
It is reported that this Shanhaiju tent is a wild camping tent jointly launched by the Great Wall and Qiuyedi, and the official guide price of Shanhaiju is 23,999 yuan.
Image source network
In the face of such a tragedy, Great Wall Motor and its cooperative tent manufacturer Akinoji quickly responded.
On the 14th, the relevant person in charge of the sales side of Great Wall Motor said that relevant personnel have been connected with the family. According to Akinochi, the current preliminary assessment tends to believe that the unfortunate incident was caused by the user's deviation from the product manual guidelines.
Image source network
On the 15th, the Great Wall Artillery expressed its condolences to the deceased and its deep concern for the family, and pledged to fully cooperate with the investigation and support Akinochi to find out the truth.
Image source network
Akinochi also expressed its deep sorrow over the accident, stressed that it would actively participate in the investigation, and promised to provide necessary help and support to the family.
Image source network
From the perspective of a bystander, the incident reflects several key issues.
First of all, even if improper user operation is the direct inducement, a high-end product for the mass consumer market, especially outdoor equipment involving personal safety, should have sufficient safety redundancy design to ensure maximum user protection even under abnormal operation. During the ascent of the tent, it is not technically impossible to theoretically have an emergency stop mechanism or a simple way to save itself.
Image source network
Secondly, the tragedy happened in full view of the public, but it was not responded to in a timely and effective manner, which has to make people question whether the emergency design of the product is perfect. As an extension of the outdoor lifestyle, the safety of the tent is not only reflected in the physical structure of the product itself, but also in whether it can give users sufficient protection measures and clear operation guidelines in an emergency, so that bystanders can quickly intervene in the rescue.
Image source network
Moreover, the incident has exposed the delicate balance between innovation and security. With the rise of camping culture, all kinds of new outdoor gear are emerging, but innovation shouldn't come at the expense of safety. Every new product launch should go through rigorous safety testing and risk assessment to ensure that it can operate stably and reliably in a variety of use cases, so as to avoid consumers becoming "test subjects" for technologies that have not been fully validated.
In short, this matter, if it is completely dumped on the user, it is not right.
What do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area.
#头条创作挑战赛 ##长城炮回应车主被车顶帐篷卡脖身亡#