laitimes

The follow-up came, and the Haixi Intermediate People's Court responded to the "remote control of the lower court by the higher court", and the comment area fell

author:Handsome bean curd

The matter of the Haixi Intermediate People's Court: Let's talk about the hot discussions on the Internet

Recently, the Haixi Prefecture Intermediate People's Court has been in trouble, and a small episode in the trial of a case has exploded on the Internet, especially about the rumors that they may remotely "guide" the trial of the lower court, which has hit everyone's sensitive point for judicial fairness and transparency. On May 13, the Intermediate People's Court posted a "Situation Statement" on its official WeChat, wanting to explain the matter clearly, but as a result, it attracted more people to watch and discuss.

The follow-up came, and the Haixi Intermediate People's Court responded to the "remote control of the lower court by the higher court", and the comment area fell

Here's how it came about

It started in a case of "picking quarrels and provoking trouble" involving 12 people, and one of the defense lawyers' actions during a break became the fuse - he took a picture of WeChat on the judge's computer without saying hello. This is good, not to mention the rules of the court, the first-class photos went out, and the Internet immediately exploded, which also had a great impact on the ongoing case.

The follow-up came, and the Haixi Intermediate People's Court responded to the "remote control of the lower court by the higher court", and the comment area fell

Netizens have their own opinions

Although the Intermediate People's Court said that the guidance was in accordance with the rules, in the eyes of netizens, this explanation does not seem to be enough. Some people stand as lawyers, feeling that sometimes they have to fight for the truth, but they also have to abide by the law; There are also people who directly pick on the thorns in the report, and feel that the key issues, such as whether the superiors really point fingers at the subordinates, are not clearly stated in the report at all, and they are lightly brushed aside.

The follow-up came, and the Haixi Intermediate People's Court responded to the "remote control of the lower court by the higher court", and the comment area fell

Let's talk about a couple of words

At the end of the day, the law has to be convincing, and it's about being fair every step of the way, and everyone has to believe in the process. The majesty of the law is based on fairness and justice, and we all look forward to not having unjust, false and wrongful convictions, and not abusing power, this is not only a matter for judges, but also for each of us to keep an eye on.

How to stabilize the road ahead?

In the future, we can do this: first, the door of the court should be opened wider, so that everyone can see it clearly and reduce misunderstandings; Second, there must be more rigid supervision to ensure that the courts can make their own decisions, and the guidance must be clear, reasonable and lawful; Third, lawyers must also be able to straighten their backs to collect evidence, so as not to stumble on the road to justice; Finally, and most importantly, the court has to use its actions to build character, and every fair judgment is the best proof of the saying "the people's court is for the people".

At the end, let's talk about something

The small turmoil in the Haixi Intermediate People's Court is actually a small test of whether our entire judicial system can withstand public scrutiny. We hope that the judiciary and public supervision can be as tacit as a pas de deux, and every challenge can push our judiciary forward and let the light of the law shine to every corner.

Read on