"Take these two!"
"This is my place, dare to go wild in my place?"
In Xixi Ancient Village, Liaobu Township, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, a photography team is taking photos of a customer in ancient costumes on the road outside the ancient village.
Loading...
Suddenly, a man in a gray T-shirt came over and claimed that filming was not allowed in the area.
The photographer questioned why he couldn't take pictures on a public road, pointing out that the road was not privately owned.
The man in the gray T-shirt insisted that the road was part of the ancient village.
Subsequently, the argument between the two sides escalated, and the atmosphere gradually became tense, and it was almost necessary to start.
The photographer tried to protect himself by recording a video, while the man in the gray T-shirt arrogantly questioned the other party's courage and asked the photographer to leave after the camera team made so much money and didn't give a penny to Furumura.
Immediately afterwards, two security guards came at the call of the man in the gray T-shirt, and his attitude was also extremely arrogant, trying to forcibly evict the camera team, and claiming "This is the ancient village, get out!" ”
The photographer countered that they only did non-commercial photography on public roads, and that there was no charging policy in the area, but they suddenly started charging the day after they opened the store.
The photographer revealed that their shop is nearby, and it is difficult not to avoid passing through this area.
They also did not go into the depths of the ancient village, and only filmed on the opposite road. The gray T-shirt man was arrogant, claiming that all the camera crews needed to pay a fee to Furumura, otherwise they were not allowed to shoot here.
Throughout the incident, the behavior and attitude of the man in the gray T-shirt sparked great displeasure among the photographers, accusing him of abusing his power for personal gain and threatening him to take further action if they did not stop shooting.
Photographers say that despite their attempts to stay calm, repeated evictions and unreasonable demands for fees have hit their bottom line.
Netizen's point of view
Even if it is from the ancient village, it is not theirs, let them take the legal basis for the fee, or the basis for the fee according to the rules and regulations of the ancient village. If not, call the police
Now there are cameras for forensics, and these people are still restrictive, and around the year 2000, these people don't know how arrogant outsiders are.
The roads built by people in their own villages, the old houses left behind can't be photographed if you don't let you take pictures, you can play, but you can't shoot in a commercial nature
You think that the scenery of other villages is good and you can enjoy it, but it is definitely not okay to shoot profitably without saying hello
Who is right and who is wrong?
In this photographic dispute in Xixi Ancient Village, Dongguan, we see a sharp confrontation between local hegemony and public rights.
A man in a gray T-shirt, claiming to be a representative of Furumura, unreasonably forbade photography on public roads and treated a legal photography team roughly.
Not only does his actions ignore the nature of public space, but also reflect a deep-seated ethno-snake mentality, using local control as an excuse to try to impose illegal taxes and fees on any activity that comes into his sight.
The man's claim that "photography is not allowed" is based solely on the protection of personal interests – that is, to protect the business of the Hanfu shop in the ancient village from being affected.
This behavior crosses the boundaries of business ethics and evolves into a kind of overbearing and self-serving local protectionism.
From a legal point of view, public roads are spaces that everyone has the right to use, whether walking, stopping or taking pictures, as long as they do not obstruct traffic and public order, they should not be subject to unwarranted restrictions.
In addition, the man and the security guards who subsequently intervened used intimidation and threats to try to force the photographer to leave, which already constituted a violation of the legitimate rights and interests of others.
Their so-called "expulsions" are groundless and a clear violation of the law's protection of civil rights.
What is even more alarming is that this behavior appears to have a local endorsement, suggesting that there may be a serious lack of local oversight of abuses of power.
For the team of photographers, they are fighting to assert their rights while maintaining their professionalism.
In the face of unjustified evictions and demands for fees, their protests were perfectly justified. Although the beauty of the ancient village deserves to be recorded, it should not come at the expense of the freedom and rights of others.
At last
In this dispute in the ancient village of Xixi in Dongguan, we see how a simple question can escalate into a major conflict.
Taking photos on public roads should be everyone's right, and there is no need to be bothered by unreasonable fees and restrictions.
It is hoped that the two sides will find a more reasonable way to resolve the issue and ensure that similar conflicts do not happen again.
What do you think?
#头条创作挑战赛#