laitimes

600 yuan anti-climbing shoes follow-up: The central media spoke, the equipment section chief panicked, and the comment area was one-sided

author:Fresh Fun Pavilion

We all have a common sense about what we wear on our bodies, that is, the more expensive things are, the better the quality, and they are also very comfortable to wear. However, this aspect of clothing should also be determined according to the concept of consumption, some people do not like to wear expensive things even if the conditions are good, and they think that affordable things are more cost-effective.

600 yuan anti-climbing shoes follow-up: The central media spoke, the equipment section chief panicked, and the comment area was one-sided

Besides, choosing cost-effective clothes is actually a kind of life attitude, which can develop the habit of thrift and thrift, and to be honest, this behavior can really put an end to people's comparison. On May 7, 2024, there was an incident of 600 yuan anti-climbing shoes in a school in Huainan, Anhui Province, which attracted the attention of many people and caused some controversy.

600 yuan anti-climbing shoes follow-up: The central media spoke, the equipment section chief panicked, and the comment area was one-sided

The cause of this incident is a questionnaire of the local education bureau, in order to eliminate the psychology of student comparison to ensure the health of students' feet, it is recommended that all primary and secondary schools such as school uniforms, by the school to organize parents to pay for students to equip students with campus health sports shoes, each pair of sports shoes in about 600 yuan, the cost is borne by the parents of students, please give your opinion.

600 yuan anti-climbing shoes follow-up: The central media spoke, the equipment section chief panicked, and the comment area was one-sided
600 yuan anti-climbing shoes follow-up: The central media spoke, the equipment section chief panicked, and the comment area was one-sided

Probably anyone who sees this questionnaire will feel inexplicable, and will also think that this is not making money in disguise? First of all, what kind of shoes are these shoes and why are they worth 600 yuan? Second, why would schools think that students wearing such expensive shoes would eliminate the fear of comparison?

600 yuan anti-climbing shoes follow-up: The central media spoke, the equipment section chief panicked, and the comment area was one-sided
600 yuan anti-climbing shoes follow-up: The central media spoke, the equipment section chief panicked, and the comment area was one-sided

In fact, many people find the content of this questionnaire ridiculous in itself, including some teachers in schools. So the school's explanation is that it is just a survey, and there is no concrete implementation. I remember when we were children, our teachers often taught us not to be extravagant and wasteful, and to develop a good habit of frugality and simplicity.

600 yuan anti-climbing shoes follow-up: The central media spoke, the equipment section chief panicked, and the comment area was one-sided

How many years have passed, why is there such a subversive change in values? In this regard, CCTV also felt very incomprehensible, so it raised a question, asking what is the truth of this matter? After investigation, we found that the questionnaire was sent from the Equipment Division of the Education Bureau.

600 yuan anti-climbing shoes follow-up: The central media spoke, the equipment section chief panicked, and the comment area was one-sided
600 yuan anti-climbing shoes follow-up: The central media spoke, the equipment section chief panicked, and the comment area was one-sided

In this regard, the staff explained that the original intention of the questionnaire was only to hope that students wearing shoes could be unified as wearing school uniforms, so that the psychology of students comparing with each other could be solved to a certain extent; Secondly, the questionnaire was originally aimed at junior high school students, but I didn't expect it to be sent to the wrong school, so it was sent to elementary school.

600 yuan anti-climbing shoes follow-up: The central media spoke, the equipment section chief panicked, and the comment area was one-sided
600 yuan anti-climbing shoes follow-up: The central media spoke, the equipment section chief panicked, and the comment area was one-sided

It seems that this explanation is fine, but netizens still think it is very far-fetched. For example, a netizen mentioned that even if it was sent to the wrong school, is it reasonable for middle school students to wear shoes for 600 yuan; Some people also said that if this matter had not fermented and there was no voice from the central media, would there have been no work mistakes?

600 yuan anti-climbing shoes follow-up: The central media spoke, the equipment section chief panicked, and the comment area was one-sided

Therefore, the response of the head of the equipment section did not satisfy netizens, and the comment area was also one-sided, there is no doubt that this questionnaire had to be controversial, and it could not solve some of the doubts of the students' parents. In other words, in the face of the investigation of relevant departments and the voice of the central media, the equipment section chief must have panicked.

600 yuan anti-climbing shoes follow-up: The central media spoke, the equipment section chief panicked, and the comment area was one-sided
600 yuan anti-climbing shoes follow-up: The central media spoke, the equipment section chief panicked, and the comment area was one-sided

Many netizens have also said many times that the most important thing for schools to do is to improve the teaching level and improve the overall performance of students. The other is to cultivate students' correct values and good ideological character, rather than how to dress and equip students. What do you think about this?

Read on