Even if the international situation is turbulent, and even if the West itself is unable to protect itself, their targeting of China has not stopped. Since May, three countries have successively "made moves" against China, and the provocation is quite strong. First, an Australian helicopter was on a so-called "mission" in the international waters of the Yellow Sea, only to be intercepted by a Chinese military aircraft. While the Chinese Navy ship formation was conducting training in the Yellow Sea, an Australian guided missile destroyer sent helicopters to maliciously approach and reconnoiter three times. In this regard, China warned that the eviction operation was not only reasonable and legal, but also fully in line with international law and practice, but the Australian side reversed the accusation that the interception by the Chinese military aircraft was extremely unsafe. Running to China's doorstep to deliberately provoke and create regional tensions, is Australia justified? After Australia, Germany set its sights on the Taiwan Strait.
According to the report, a German frigate and supply ship went to the Pacific Ocean for a training mission. Considering that German Foreign Minister Baerbock declared during a visit to New Zealand last month that the "right of peaceful passage" applies to the Taiwan Strait, it cannot be ruled out that Germany will now send warships through the Taiwan Strait. In addition to Australia and Germany, the United States once again sent electronic reconnaissance planes to conduct reconnaissance along the airspace lines off the coast of Guangdong, Hainan Island, and the Xisha Islands. These three countries have provoked China from the direction of the Yellow Sea, the Taiwan Strait, and the South China Sea, and although the reasons for the provocation are different, they all have the same tactics, in an attempt to weave an "encirclement" to contain China in the Indo-Pacific region.
As allies and partners of the United States, how can Australia and Germany not do their part? Having said that, choosing this time to make a series of moves against China is obviously not entirely aimed at provoking China, at least in my opinion, it is very likely that in this way, it is likely that the tense situation in North Korea, the troubled South China Sea, and Taiwan, which is facing the "storm" of the re-election, are all blamed on China. After all, North Korea, the South China Sea, and Taiwan are all in a situation where the slightest friction can lead to an escalation of the situation. Therefore, how can the United States let go of this opportunity to throw the pot of tension in the region to China? It's just that this time they didn't expect that they might not have time to run away as soon as they made a move at the door of China.
It is reported that the first stop of Russian President Putin's new term of office is China. Regardless of whether Putin's announcement of his visit to China at this time is a coincidence, it is certain that he personally nodded to China and was "giving the truth" to China. After all, the choice of China as the destination for the first visit is a high recognition of Sino-Russian relations, and at the same time, it is also a warning to certain countries that are ready to move. Sino-Russian relations will be as good as ever, or even better, and Russia will not agree to deal with China. Similarly, China will not be blind to Russia. The Chinese ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary to the Russian Federation said bluntly that China very much welcomes Putin's visit to China after taking office. Therefore, Putin's move is equivalent to smashing a hammer for China, and the United States and the West have been afraid of the closer Sino-Russian relations, and now they can only be said to be more worried, but there seems to be no other way except worry.