Hello dear friends! I am your old friend A Zhu, before reading this article, please click "Follow" to make a fortune, which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also to receive the wonderful stories carefully prepared for you every day, thank you in advance! Thank you very much for your support!
Today's topic for you:
Why can't people in the city go to the countryside to buy homesteads?
Many netizens shared below, which made me suddenly realize
If you open your mouth, the rich can annex land and shake the foundation of the country.
If the allocation of resources cannot be allocated to the rural areas, it is difficult for the rural areas to become rich, and once they are allocated to the point where they are rich and destitute, the time is very short, and they are in a dilemma
If you let go of land annexation, it will be 30 years at most, and hundreds of millions of people will have no place to stand, and then it will not be a matter of whether you sell your homestead or not, and there are ways for you to sell [laughs] At most, you can't afford to buy a house now, and maybe the house will have nothing to do with you in the future.
The years in history with the most land annexations are invariably disaster years, which means that peasants can no longer survive except for selling their houses and land
Isn't this the problem he said: "If we want to make the countryside better, we first need to support the countryside, and don't move all the resources that farmers need to the cities, resulting in no resources at all in the countryside." "Of course you can't farm without resources
I'm a rich man, buy a homestead and put it away, you rural people, you have to go to the city to buy a house, rent a house, house prices skyrocket, rents skyrocket, reference to Hong Kong, Hong Kong young people don't even have a place to stand
Land annexation was the direct cause of the peasant movement.
I said how can I take 10,000 people and leave, it seems that I have fought for it myself, and there has never been a savior
In ancient times, this was not how the landless peasants could only become slaves of the landlords. After opening up, I thought I could make money. Prohibiting the sale of homesteads is to protect the bottom line of not becoming a slave for you.
The peasants had land, and they wore shoes, even if they wore tattered straw sandals. If the peasants really want to sell their land and go to the city to work, they will become completely barefoot. When the time comes, there will be more barefoot, which one is not afraid of wearing leather shoes?
15w they are also reluctant, 4w expropriation of cultivated land, and then change the nature of the land, change hands and add two 0 to sell to Meizizi
The homestead is a minefield, which cannot be touched at all, and the peasants sell the homestead, and after a few years they can't get along outside, so they can only be unrest when the homeless [tears run] the homeless reaches a certain number
Farmers don't sell land at all, farmers will use the land to buy shares in themselves as developers [dog heads]
It's not worth refuting. If we really prevent mergers, it will be the same as in cities, and if we set a purchase limit on how many square meters of homestead each household can buy, we will be done. Now that there are no people in the countryside, many young people are settling down in the cities, and the houses that have been built with money in the countryside are not allowed to be bought and sold, but can only be abandoned. Is it fair? In the name of protection, in fact, it harms the interests of the peasants. Those who oppose the search for bases in the rural areas are just afraid that if they find a base in the rural areas, they can buy and sell, and their houses in the cities will not be easy to sell
What do you think about this?
Thank you for reading, I wish you a happy day and everything goes well when you see this, welcome to leave a message to discuss! Don't forget to like and follow~
See you in the comments section!