Chen Meng qualified for the women's singles, at first just for fairness, but now she has become a laughing stock

Lao Le said ball

2024-05-13 09:33Posted in Hebei Sports Creators

On May 14th, the women's singles candidates for the national table tennis women's team to participate in the Paris Olympics will be announced, according to the current points ranking, in fact, it has been revealed, the women's singles qualification owners are Sun Yingsha and Chen Meng, so this Olympic cycle, for Sun Yingsha and Chen Meng, are full of harvest, and in the last period of time, Chen Meng seized this opportunity and obtained the women's singles qualification, but the rules for women's singles qualification were formulated only for the sake of fairness at first, but now it has become a laughing stock.

In the Olympic Games, there can only be two players from each association to participate, and the national table tennis is no exception, the star-studded national table tennis team can be said to be very fierce in the qualification for the Olympic Games.

It is because many players of national table tennis go to the Olympic Games with great hope to impact medals, even gold medals. Then one of the tests before participating in the Olympics is even more crucial, and that is the comprehensive strength evaluation of each Olympic cycle.

In the Tokyo Olympics cycle, in fact, the national table tennis also has a certain comprehensive strength evaluation, from which to choose, for the national table tennis coaching staff, more suitable candidates to participate in the Olympic Games, although there are also many fans who put forward different opinions, but in general, the expert watch, the coaching staff knows, who is more suitable for such a big stage.

But in the Paris cycle, for the women's team, it seems that there are too many rules that many fans don't know very well, because each rule is made at first to make fans see fairness, but now it has become a laughing stock.

In order to let more people understand such rules, it is for the sake of fairness, and in the end, who can qualify for women's singles will be judged in the form of points. But the coaching staff may not have imagined that this wrong approach would backfire.

At what point in time Wang Yidi became the candidate for the women's singles qualification for the Asian Games, I believe everyone knows that it is from this point in time that the rules and mechanisms for the women's singles qualification for the Paris Olympics have become a laughing stock.

In view of Wang Yidi's performance at the World Table Tennis Championships in Busan, the national table tennis will deprive Wang Yidi of his qualification to participate in the Olympic Games.

Therefore, the rule mechanism of deducting 3,000 points from the foreign export association came into being, otherwise Wang Yidi's qualifications would be deprived for no reason, and it is impossible to say that it is impossible to say, because as long as you rely on the rules, you must act in accordance with the rules, so 3,000 points will be under pressure for Chen Meng and Wang Manyu.

When losing to Batra, it will also be directly announced that Wang Manyu will not qualify for the Olympic women's singles, which seems to be even more incomprehensible, why Wang Manyu's efforts in the whole cycle are ruined in one game, is this a bit too harsh.

Chen Meng must be very happy after getting the women's singles qualification, but Chen Meng's heart is also mixed, if someone says that the qualification for the Asian Games was originally Chen Meng's, this is understandable, and although Chen Meng has not won the championship for a long time, but her entire Paris cycle, every stop, the results are quite stable, at least, there are points in the account, you can become a competitor for the women's singles qualification. If you add the points of the Asian Games, maybe Chen Meng will determine the women's singles qualification early.

summary

This is the whole Paris cycle, a farce for the national table tennis women's team, going around and around, at the beginning, the rules were formulated, perhaps for the sake of fairness, so that everyone was convinced, but the rules changed day and day, but it became a laughing stock, and the original fairness was actually fairness for the sake of fairness.

View original image 164K

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

•