Recently, a divorce case of a couple in Xiamen, Fujian Province, caused a stir on the Internet. The 3 million mansion given by her mother-in-law became a "cash cow" in her daughter-in-law's mouth after the marriage broke down. This can't help but make people sigh: Is the value of marriage really only material?
Loading...
It is understood that the couple originally lived a happy and contented life. The mother-in-law loved her daughter-in-law very much, not only gave 60,000 yuan of sugar cake money and 160,000 yuan of dowry according to local customs, but also gave a mansion worth 3 million yuan. However, the good times did not last long, and the husband's gambling habits were gradually exposed, and he owed a huge debt, which plunged the originally happy family into crisis.
After many attempts to persuade her to no avail, the woman chose to divorce. This was a reasonable choice, but her request for property division was a big surprise. She claimed that she deserved half of the mansion's share, which was converted into 750,000 yuan in cash. This can't help but make people want to ask: is this really to protect their own rights and interests, or is marriage a "cash cow"?
Of course, the man did not agree to such a request. He insisted that the divorce was due to personality mismatch, not gambling. He also said that his family had given the woman's family 500,000 yuan of property when he got married, including a dowry. As for the mansion, he believes that it is his mother's property and has nothing to do with the woman. He is only willing to compensate the woman another 200,000 yuan, but the property must be owned by himself.
This "wealthy" divorce case quickly caused heated discussions on the Internet. Some people support the woman, believing that she has given her youth and affection in this marriage and should be compensated as she deserves. But there are also those who question the woman's motives, believing that she is too greedy and uses marriage as a tool to make money.
Of course, there are also people who criticize the man. They believe that the man's gambling behavior in the marriage has seriously hurt the feelings of the woman and the family, and he should bear more responsibility. At the same time, some people also questioned whether the true intention of the man's family when he donated the property was "plotted" from the beginning.
In this controversy, we have to think about the question: what is the value of marriage? Is it to pursue material comforts and monetary gains, or to find a partner who supports each other and grows together?
In my opinion, marriage should be a contractual relationship based on love and responsibility. Both sides should respect, understand and support each other, and face the challenges and difficulties in life together. When there are problems in the marriage, we should face and deal with them with a mature and rational attitude, instead of blindly pursuing material interests or shirking responsibilities.
Of course, in this materialistic society, material interests are often the focus of people's attention. But we should understand that true happiness and satisfaction come from inner satisfaction and emotional communication, not material accumulation and pursuit.
In conclusion, I would like to say this: let's cherish the partner and feelings around us, and don't let material interests become the main culprit in ruining marriage. At the same time, I also hope that those who are going through a marriage crisis can bravely face the reality and make the right choice. After all, happiness is in your own hands!