Text/Water is clear
106-111, the Knicks lost to the Pacers, the series score was chased to 2-1, the game came to the last 3 minutes, the Knicks had a chance to win, but the referee "blew the penalty" 4 times directly affected the outcome of the game, and restored it to the fans in detail in the form of slow motion.
The Knicks lost to the Pacers
Carlisle was dissatisfied with the penalty in the last game, paying a $35,000 fine to put pressure on the referee, and the effect was immediate, with four extremely crucial home whistles coming one after another.
Carlisle's challenge succeeded
The Knicks fell behind 101-102, Brunson forced Nesmith, the referee has blown a foul, Carlisle challenged, in the past, the referee would look for all possible ways to maintain the original decision, but today, Brunson changed direction to the left, Nesmith had an obvious foul, but the referee ignored it, and awarded Carlisle a successful challenge, both sides were fouls that were free throws, but the referee did not let Brunson get a free throw opportunity.
The interference ball does not blow
The two sides fought to 102 draws, DiVincenzo and Harten made a mistake in Haliburton, Hart immediately counterattacked, and Turner blocked the ball when it had touched the rebound, obviously interfering with the ball, but the referee ignored it again, and the slow motion explained it clearly:
Slow motion
The ball touched the rebound first, and Turner rushed to the block, which should have been a two-point effect, and the Knicks led 104-102, but the referee not only did not blow the ball offensively, but the next second was even more unbearable.
Siakam hugs people and doesn't blow fouls
The Pacers quickly counterattacked, and when Nembhard received the ball and burst inside, pay attention to the fact that Halten was locked by Siakam behind his back and did not give him a chance to make up for the defense, so that Nembhard had an empty basket, and the foul that occurred under the nose of the referee on the baseline did not blow, so angry that Halten angrily sprayed the referee, and the referee who was at a loss did not dare to have any response.
Brunson then made a three-pointer to tie the game at 106 and Nembhard made a three-pointer to take a 109-106 lead before the fourth controversial penalty was awarded.
Brunson didn't get a three-point foul
Knicks sideline ball tactics, Brunson used double cover to get rid of the ball at the top of the right arc, and when Turner was out of position, Nembhard who defended DiVincenzo slapped Brunson's right arm with his right hand, and Brunson jumped up to make a three-point foul, but the referee continued to choose to ignore it.
Slow motion
In slow motion, it is clear that Nembhard not only did not touch the ball at all, but also hit Brunson's arm so firmly that his whole body staggered, and such an obvious foul was not blown, so that the Knicks lost the opportunity to equalize at the free throw line, and the game lost suspense.
At this point, looking at the referee's blowing penalty at the last moment, Brunson was fouled by Nesmith and did not blow and did not get two free throws; Hart's counter-attack was not blown, and the team dropped two more points; Siakam obviously hugged people and didn't blow for an offensive foul, and gave Nembhard two more points; Brunson obviously made a three-point foul and did not blow, and the referee's four blows at the decisive moment affected the final outcome of the game.