My friend's daughter failed in the public examination, and the political trial was "hanging" on the strange experience, and it was a pity to hear the reason!
Two days ago, I chatted with my long-time friend Xiaomei about her daughter Xiaoyu's recent situation.
I thought she would tell me happily that Xiaoyu had successfully passed the civil service exam and was about to embark on a career in office.
Unexpectedly, what came from the other end of the phone was Xiaomei's bitter sigh.
It turned out that although Xiaoyu was among the best in the interview, she finally encountered Waterloo in the political trial.
As soon as I heard this, my heart "chuckled".
As the "last checkpoint" of the civil service examination, the political examination has always been known for its rigor.
But Xiaoyu was born in a scholarly family, has a good family style, and is even more humble and polite, unlike a child who will have problems in this kind of place.
When I asked why, Xiaomei was hesitant and didn't seem to be willing to say.
It was only after my repeated questioning that she revealed an unbelievable reason.
It turned out that Xiaoyu had participated in an overseas summer camp during college.
There, she and her campers visited some of the area's historic sites, including a controversial shrine.
When Xiaomei said this, her tone was full of unwillingness and anger.
She felt that her daughter had been treated unfairly, and she was sentenced to "death" for such a "trivial" trivial matter, which is really ridiculous!
After listening to Xiaomei's story, my heart became heavy.
A promising child was ruthlessly "killed" by the political trial like this, how can it not make people sigh?
Civil servants are known as "servants of the people", holding a certain amount of public power in their hands, representing the image of the government and the country.
They must have a firm political stance, the ability to distinguish between right and wrong, good and evil, and not have any "stains".
Even a moment of confusion or carelessness can become a "fatal injury".
Therefore, it is not unreasonable that the political trial is so strict.
The point is, situations like Xiaoyu are probably not uncommon in real life.
Many young people inevitably have some "rookie" experiences during their studies.
They may have done something immature or appropriate out of ignorance or curiosity.
But can these experiences really determine a person's life?
Can't people constantly improve themselves and improve their understanding in the process of growth?
If you are beaten to death with a stick and vetoed with one vote, is it a bit "one-size-fits-all"?
What's more, in the age of the internet, everyone can leave a large "digital footprint" behind.
Weibo, Moments, QQ Space...... may become a "sensitive area" for political trials.
The slightest carelessness can undo all the work you have done.
In such an environment, how many young people can we walk steadily on the "single-plank bridge" of political trial?
How many people will miss out on their coveted status as a civil servant because of some innocuous "black history"?
Perhaps, we really need to reflect on whether the standards of political review can be more humane?
Is it possible to be more tolerant and understanding of young people's past experiences?
After all, every valuable talent is the wealth of the country and the nation.
We need to judge a person with a developmental perspective and a comprehensive perspective, rather than simply "condemning the death penalty".
Of course, that's just my word for it.
The formulation of political review policies needs to consider various factors, and it is not something that can be decided by wishful thinking.
But I sincerely hope that Xiaoyu's experience can arouse the attention and reflection of relevant departments.
What do you think of the examination of candidates' past experiences in the civil service political examination? Do you think a situation like Xiaoyu is worth reflecting on? Feel free to leave a message in the comment section and discuss this topic with me.