After being single for 36 years, she finally couldn't help but make a move. She put forward four requirements for choosing a mate in one breath, which made countless single men exclaim: "Who can withstand this!" Her request seems absurd and unreasonable, but it accurately hits the pain point of marriage. Is it a bizarre demand, or a reasonable demand? Today, let's take a look at the strange theory of choosing a couple for this older leftover girl.
Loading...
Recently, a 36-year-old woman posted a marriage notice on social media, putting forward a request for a mate, which attracted widespread attention.
The four requirements for a woman to choose a mate are:
Financial control: All income after marriage goes to the woman's disposal, including the money of the in-laws.
Real estate transfer: After marriage, the property and vehicle must be transferred to the woman's name.
Consent to expenditures: The woman's consent must be obtained for every future expenditure.
Housework exemption: The woman does not undertake any housework after marriage because she has not done it and will not do it.
The woman said that these four requirements were put forward by her after careful consideration and were the minimum standard to protect her rights and interests after marriage. She believes that as an independent woman in the new era, she has the right to fight for equality and security for herself.
The woman's request for a mate has aroused heated discussions among netizens.
Some netizens feel that the woman's requirements are too harsh, believing that marriage is a community of two people and should not be built on such an unequal basis.
There is support for the idea of women, who should have equal status and financial security in marriage.
Some people also think that age is here, if there is a condition, why not find a lighter one.
Some netizens also think that if the man also asks for this, will the woman accept it?
Some netizens feel that this is a script used to win traffic.
At first glance, these four requirements seem to be a bit "overbearing", and some people even question whether she is looking for a husband with a "clear price".
Is this girl's request reasonable? Let's analyze and analyze first.
She demanded that all the property after the marriage go to her, which was indeed a bit excessive. Marriage is a matter for two people, and property should also be joint. If one party controls all the property, won't the other become an "economic slave"?
The transfer of the house and car to her name is a reasonable request. After all, the house and car are all large assets, and the transfer of ownership to the woman's name after marriage can ensure the safety of her property.
Her requirement that every expenditure be approved by her is a bit overkill. Marriage is inherently a community of two people, and they should share the family expenses. If every sum of money has to be agreed by one party, then wouldn't the other party live a miserable life?
In the end, she asked not to do housework after marriage, which was the most speechless. Marriage is not an employment relationship between a nanny and an employer, but a life of two people. Housework should be shared, not taken care of by one party.
The girl's requirements for choosing a mate were too biased and did not conform to the principle of equality in marriage. Marriage should be based on love, respect, and responsibility, not on the absolute control of one partner over the other.
Many people think that older leftover women can't get married because they have too high vision and pick and choose. In fact, older leftover women also have their own criteria for choosing a mate, and they pursue equality, respect and love. They just don't want to settle, they don't want to get married for the sake of getting married.
We can't look at older leftover women with colored glasses. They also have the right to pursue happiness. We should respect their criteria for choosing a mate and wish them to find their true destiny as soon as possible.
What do you think about this?