In "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", Zhuge Liang is portrayed as a near-perfect strategist, known for his profound wisdom and extraordinary talents. However, he did not always rank first in the evaluation of history and literature. This article will explore five strategists during the Three Kingdoms period who were considered better than Zhuge Liang, try to dissect their strategic talents and historical achievements, and explore why Zhuge Liang ranked sixth in this ranking.
Xun Yu - the solid foundation of the Wei State
Xun Yu, also known as Wen Ruo, was one of Cao Cao's chief advisors, and with his political vision and steady strategy, he laid a solid foundation for the early establishment of the Wei state. He was not only involved in a number of key military operations, but also had a profound impact on the political system and domestic administration.
Xun Yu advocated centralization, strengthened laws, and implemented agricultural development policies, laying a solid foundation for Cao Cao's unification of the north. Although his career did not see the final shape of the Three Kingdoms, his political wisdom and steady style made him the top of the list of strategists.
Guo Jia - a military wizard with outstanding strategic vision
Guo Jia, whose name is Fengxiao, has a short career, but he is known for his keen strategic vision and excellent military forecasting. In the Battle of Guandu, he helped Cao Cao defeat Yuan Shao with his profound insight, thus establishing Cao Cao's supremacy in the north.
Guo Jia is adept at using surprise tactics and conversions, and his tactical designs are both bold and creative, and can often determine the course of war. His early death was seen as a great loss to Cao Cao and his military clique.
Zhuge Dan - a master of conspiracy and conspiracy
Zhuge Dan is not the main character in "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", but in history, he is known for his strong political ambitions and complex domestic political skills.
His strategy often revolved around maintaining his power and position, and although he ultimately failed to establish a lasting regime, his ability to political strategy and strategic layout did give him a place in the ranks of strategists.
Jia Xu - a wise man who maintained the balance of the three kingdoms of Wei, Wu and Shu
Jia Xu, whose political career spanned the three generations of Cao Cao, Cao Pi and Cao Rui, was one of the most outstanding politicians during the Three Kingdoms period. Jia Xu is good at contingency and can find space for survival and development in complex political situations.
His wisdom is not only reflected in military affairs, but also in how to maintain the stability and development of the country through foreign and domestic policies. His reform of the rule of law and political system laid the foundation for the long-term peace and stability of the Wei state.
Pang Tong - Mr. Feng Xiao's military talent
Although his life was relatively short, Pang Tong and his outstanding military talents left a strong mark in history.
In the process of Liu Bei's capture of Yizhou, Pang Tong provided important strategic advice. Although he was tragically killed in the battle to capture Mengda, his military talent and contribution to the early development of the Shu Han dynasty made him one of the best strategists.
The mystery of Zhuge Liang's sixth place
Back to Zhuge Liang, why can he only be in sixth place in such a ranking? While Zhuge Liang undoubtedly demonstrated great military and political prowess, such as the years of conquest during the Northern Expedition and his careful management of Shu Han's internal affairs, some of his decisions, such as the misuse of Ma Jian and his failure to completely change Shu Han's strategic situation, may have influenced his historical evaluation to some extent.
In addition, Zhuge Liang's policies, although forward-looking in the long run, did not see significant results during his lifetime, which may also be the reason why he failed to rank higher in the strategist rankings.
When evaluating the advisors of the Three Kingdoms period, we should consider not only their political and military achievements, but also the adaptability and effectiveness of their strategies in the context of the time. This evaluation may explain why Zhuge Liang failed to rank first in some rankings, but it does not detract from his status as one of history's great strategists.
What do you think about this? Welcome to discuss!