Click to follow ➕ and share, your wallet will rise every day!
Cover a variety of topics and share a variety of discussions
Use unbridled thinking to write unique reviews
Take a look, think about it, talk about it
Focus on having something new to talk about every day
Today's new conversations:
Who is more credible in "The Bamboo Book Chronicle" or "Historical Records"?
This is possible, the history books of the Wei State are hundreds of years ago from the early Shang period, and it is normal to have mistakes. The key is that whether it is the version of the Ming Dynasty or the version of the Qing Dynasty, I don't know how much has been processed, and it is difficult to say whether it is the real bamboo book chronology.
However, according to the oracle bone inscriptions, the thinking of the ancients is very unique, and it may be that Yi Yin and Shang Tang should be an alliance, rather than a simple relationship between monarchs and ministers, and later Yi Yin's descendants also held the state authority for a long time
The main reason is that the bamboo book year was unearthed in the Western Jin Dynasty, and if you combine the way of the Western Jin Dynasty to win the world, you will feel that this bamboo book year is very interesting
Indeed, I agree with you.
Books that are a little more ancient, such as the Analects of the Spring and Autumn Zuo Chuan, actually pay attention to the use of words, often omitting many subjects and objects, and even using nouns as verbs, and many words are kneaded into one word and written, which is very difficult to read. The writing in the Bamboo Chronicle is too "straight" and does not look like a more ancient text.
None of the Warring States families have ever made such a powerful statement. Han Fei of the Legalist only said that it was very hard to be the Son of Heaven when Yao Shunyu was the Son of Heaven, so it was not difficult to let Zen let go.
I always feel that the paragraph before Xiang Yu's death is too detailed. So detailed that you can't find the way, let the old farmer show the way, this kind of detail can be restored? It can only be that Xiang Yu's subordinates at that time had no people who died in battle, and recorded a confession
Isolated and unproven, the bamboo book is a lone book, and now it is circulated and lost, and most of what you see now is a fake book. It may even be that the Bamboo Book Chronicle is a fake book made by the people of the Jin Dynasty
The Spring and Autumn Period is more reliable than the left pass, and the left pass is more reliable than the historical records. The most reliable is the underground information
It's so fake! Historians admit that this book is not recognized! Because no one has seen it and it has not been handed down, the compilation has also been lost! Now the source of the two versions is ridiculous!
The historical value of the Zhushu chronicle about the early Warring States period is extremely high, but the historical value of the historical materials about the Five Emperors and Xia Shang is not much higher than that of the historical records
Yao Shunyu are all people before the Xia Dynasty, whether there are these people, whether people call this name or not is unknown, until now a lot of the history of the Xia Dynasty is still unknown today, Wei Xianggong has also been separated by one or two thousand years, how do you know so much