Recently, a man's divorce request to divide the real estate donated by the woman's parents has attracted widespread attention
She registered her marriage in 2007 and gave birth to two daughters after marriage. Since the separation in 2018, Zhang has sued the court, asking for a divorce from Li, asking the court to rule that the legitimate daughter should be raised by himself, and divide the joint property of the husband and wife in accordance with the law.
Court: One child per person, the property is not joint property and will not be supported
Netizens are hotly discussed
Usually: "Bear children for you men". Divorce: "A man has a child for nothing"
Out of the woman's belly, it is the woman who suffers, and the man is indeed so happy that he has a child in vain, so most of the divorce cases are awarded to the mother.
If it is an inheritance inherited during the marriage, the legal level is indeed shared by the husband and wife, that is, it is morally unjustifiable to divorce after getting the money
He doesn't have a house, no money, no ability, and he still wants a child, what's the matter, the child goes to the street to beg to support him
Isn't it just asking for someone's room for the reason of raising children?
Therefore, the family, men and women are equal, each is financially independent, can help each other, and does not rely on only one party. These are easy to divide
Version t0 can that be the same?
This kind of judgment depends mainly on which side generally upholds the natives. Of course, if this fact is clear, the man is indeed excessive, and he has no money for the house, and he doesn't have a B number in his heart
No, some time ago, the news woman just divided the real estate given by the man's parents, why can't it be the other way around?
Some time ago, the man divided the inheritance of hundreds of millions of the woman's parents, why don't you say it?
Each is financially independent, relying on more than one side, so it is easy to divide
The comment section blew up
It can only be said that the woman consciously took precautions in advance, and the gift does not belong to the common property, if the inheritance after marriage or her own purchase, or demolition compensation, then it will be shared, both men and women must learn and refuse to help the poor!