There was another traffic accident, and the ground was full of debris, but it was very "calm" and did not cause a "cyber tsunami" like the rear-end collision accident of the M7 in the world!
But once again, it makes people think about a question, if the popularization of intelligent driving can reduce the number of traffic accidents by at least half of the existing annual traffic accidents, otherwise the existence of intelligent driving will be useless except to sell at a higher price!
That's why everyone pays so much attention to the rear-end collision accident of the M7: because everyone is looking at smart driving, and wants to complain about smart driving, they all think that smart driving failed to avoid it, and they all think that AEB has not played a role, so they want to blame Huawei for not bringing better travel safety guarantees.
This time it is a non-intelligent model, and the speed of 115KM/h exceeds the trigger distance of AEB.
It was found that after the release of ADS2.0 and continuous updates, Huawei has improved the AEB forward active safety to 120km/h, and also added lateral active safety of 40-130km/h and rear reversing active safety of 1-60km/h.
Another is intelligent driving technology, you can see that the back of the operating vehicle is smoke and dust from a distance, so it is difficult to avoid it if you don't slow down and keep your distance in advance, so if it is intelligent driving, can you predict it in advance!
The whole system is equipped with high-end intelligent driving as standard, this is the configuration of the new M5, why do foreign manufacturers say that lidar is useless, but Huawei, which also uses visual driving technology solutions, still maintains it, and obviously there is a plan that does not carry lidar, and then I see the owner sharing the "one avoidance back to the original" I probably understand, that is, there is a limit to vision, and the role of lidar is to take the initiative to see!
When the backlight or light is insufficient, it is necessary to see someone walking on the zebra crossing at a very close distance, and the lidar can actively shoot out the light to see the whole scene in advance, so the judgment of active braking is made! If it is a human driving operation, in addition to braking, it will also hit the steering wheel sharply, because it is difficult to brake without predicting the deceleration in advance.
From this point of view, intelligent driving is effective, who is good, whose bad is waiting for the test of time now, not touting "self-selling and boasting"!