Q M7 Accident Revealed: Who is responsible?
"There is a reason for the incident, and there is no evidence", but with the deepening of the investigation, the truth of the M7 rear-end fire accident seems to have gradually surfaced. The accident not only touched the hearts of the victims' families, but also aroused widespread public concern about the safety performance of the car.
Recently, the M7 caught fire in a rear-end collision at high speed, resulting in many deaths. After the accident, the door could not be opened. It is reported that the door of the car is provided by Cialis and adopts an electronic control system. However, at the time of the accident, the door could not be unlocked automatically, resulting in the driver and passengers unable to escape in time. In response, Cialis said that the model was not equipped with an automatic unlocking function, and the driver and occupants were unconscious at the time of the accident.
In this accident, the ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance System) scheme of the M7 has also attracted attention. It is reported that the ADAS solution of this model is neither provided by Huawei nor Bosch, but from Zhejiang FreeTech. This news has made many people question the intelligent driving system of Wenjie. In fact, the full set of solutions used in the intelligent driving version of the Wenjie model is developed by Huawei, while the non-intelligent driving version of the model adopts the solutions of Bosch and FreeTech.
This begs the question: Does the choice of supplier affect the safety performance of the vehicle?
Netizens are hotly discussed
After the accident, the comments of netizens were also varied. Some people question whether the intelligent driving system in the world is reliable enough, some blame the solutions provided by the suppliers for being flawed, and others lament the fragility and impermanence of life.
Among them, a netizen's comment is quite representative: "The good car of Wenjie is made by Huawei, and the accident of Wenjie is provided by the supplier." Is this Huawei's pot or the supplier's pot?", although this sentence has a certain amount of ridicule, it also reflects the public's concern and concern about the safety performance of automobiles.
The vehicle does not automatically unlock after a collision as described in the manual.
Even some netizens broke the news that the same problem had occurred in their own question world before
Netizens began to attack Huawei
Author's point of view
I am deeply saddened and regretted by this accident. Life is precious, and any traffic accident is a ruthless deprivation of life. However, from this accident, we can also see the importance of car safety performance. Both automakers and suppliers should be responsible for the safety performance of their vehicles, ensuring that every vehicle can protect its passengers at critical moments.
At the same time, this accident also reminds us that while enjoying the convenience and comfort brought by technology, we should also pay attention to the safety risks behind technology. Today, with the increasing popularity of intelligent driving technology, we should strengthen the supervision and evaluation of vehicle safety performance to ensure that these technologies can truly bring benefits to human beings.
In closing, I would like to say that every traffic accident is a profound lesson. We should learn from this experience and constantly improve our safety awareness and driving skills to protect the lives of ourselves and others. At the same time, we should also pay attention to the development trends and technological innovation of the automotive industry, and contribute to building a safer and smarter travel environment.