Can't eat all the pits?
Loading...
After this sentence spread on the Internet, it quickly sparked widespread discussion. It is derived from the ideas of a well-known scholar at an academic lecture. He pointed out that in order to perpetuate the survival of plants, most of the pits have a bitter taste so as not to be eaten by animals and destroy the seeds, with very few exceptions, such as almonds.
This seemingly interesting argument should have only sparked discussion in academic circles. Unexpectedly, due to the exposure of the video, it became the subject of laughter on the Internet. The reason for this is that it is contrary to the daily life experience of many people. In fact, peanuts, corn, and peach kernels sold in ordinary markets are widely eaten by humans.
Many netizens have pointed out that scholars do not seem to have tried these conventional foods. Some people even questioned the inappropriateness of judging laws on a case-by-case basis. However, some netizens mediated for the scholar, suggesting that he might only refer to drupes. There is truth in both sides, and it is difficult to tell which one is more appropriate. Perhaps, the key is to listen to different voices and then make personal reflections and judgments.
In fact, the "common sense" in daily life is not static, and it is necessary to constantly examine and update it in order to avoid being misled by stereotypes. As a scholar, we should be open and objective. As a general public, we should not make conclusions lightly, and should carefully consider various possibilities. After all, scientific progress is based on questioning and dialogue.
The "common sense" of daily life covers a wide range of areas, and it is inevitable that there will be places where the boundaries are blurred. Simply summarizing the conclusion, it is inevitable to ignore the differences in details. For example, whether to classify peanuts as pits? The key is to take a dialectical view, consider all factors, and avoid half-understanding or self-righteousness.
We should be open and cautious about scientific issues. Don't jump to conclusions, and don't take different points of view lightly. Academic research is a process of open debate, and it is necessary to test the truth through practice. We should not overgeneralize the "common sense" of daily life, nor should we think that everything can be applied to every detail.
The edges of reality are often not easily delineated, and answers need to be sought through in-depth research. Dialogue and debate between different voices is of great significance to the progress of science. We should deal with differences of opinion with peace and respect. Through open communication, it is possible to understand each other and find the essence of the problem. As a member of the public, it is also important to enhance critical skills when learning new knowledge.
We should not blindly follow a certain point of view, but should think about problems from multiple perspectives. Of course, disseminating knowledge also requires responsibility. In the face of doubts, we should base our interpretations on the basis of factual data and with an open mind.
Only by engaging in dialogue based on inclusiveness and respect can experts from different fields communicate effectively and find the best solutions to problems. Each of us should cultivate this attitude of pursuing the truth and jointly promote the inheritance and development of the scientific spirit, which will be conducive to the common progress of all sectors of our society.