laitimes

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

author:Teasing the poor ghost

Food security is an important component of national security, which is related to the vital interests of the people and social stability. Recently, the phenomenon of "cutting green and destroying grain" has aroused widespread concern in society.

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen
The so-called "cutting green and destroying grain" refers to cutting wheat and other food crops as silage when they are not yet mature.

There has been a lot of uproar about the peasants being severely investigated for cutting their greens, with some people supporting this practice and some denying it.

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

Why do you sell seedlings? I think that's the most straightforward reason.

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

However, it is true that cutting green and destroying grain will have a certain impact and may pose a threat to food security.

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

For the sake of food security, it is clear that "cutting green and destroying grain" should be strictly prevented.

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

What is the attitude of the common people, let's take a look!

Because they have not made a contribution, and then they have no right to enjoy social security, some people do not have to pay and can be regarded as payment, and they can also be counted as seniority when they go to the countryside, and those who work in the fields all day have no seniority, which is ridiculous in this society.

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

You don't have the right to dispose of the grain you grow.

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

The peasants are old and young, who will solve the problem of food and clothing, and who will consider the treatment?

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

If corn and wheat are ripe and cannot be sold for about half the price of green storage fodder! Should we criticize the peasants for buying green storage, or should we ask why the price of grain is so low?

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

Food is for eating.

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

If we don't solve the problem of peasant income, is it a long-term solution to just use big hats to suppress people?

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

Figure out where the root of the problem is?

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

You have to check the acquired company and remove it from the source.

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

Where should the interests of the peasants begin?

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

The editor has something to say:

Behind this phenomenon of "cutting green and destroying grain" reflects the peasants' interests and the problem of food security.

We need to understand why farmers choose to cut and sell their seedlings. Earnings are undoubtedly the most direct driving force for farmers. Factors such as fluctuating grain prices, market instability, and rising production costs may lead farmers to choose to cut grain before it is ripe in order to obtain certain economic benefits.

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

However, ensuring food security is also equally important, and we need to strictly guard against the behavior of "cutting green and destroying grain". However, we should not just rely on strict regulation and penalties to solve the problem, but should dig deep into the root cause of the problem and solve the problem at the source.

Peasants are the main body of grain production, and their interests should be fully guaranteed. However, the reality is that farmers' production costs are rising, food prices are fluctuating, and income is unstable, which makes farmers often choose a conservative strategy in the face of market risks, that is, cutting and selling green seedlings.

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

Therefore, solving the problems of farmers' interests and increasing their income is one of the keys to ensuring food security. In this process, we need to solve the problem from multiple aspects. We should pay attention to the interests of peasants, increase their incomes, and protect their legitimate rights and interests. We must strengthen supervision and control of the grain market, stabilize grain prices, and ensure grain supply. We need to improve the efficiency of food use and reduce food waste.

In addition, we should also pay attention to the use of food. Food is meant to be eaten, not wasted. Therefore, we should strengthen the management of grain storage, processing, and marketing, reduce grain waste, and improve the efficiency of grain utilization.

Farmers have no right to "cut green and destroy grain", and their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 108 yuan, and the comment area has fallen

What do you think of the view that the peasants have no right to "cut green and destroy grain" and that their food security is threatened in order to sell an extra 18 yuan?

Read on