The owner was refused to pick up the sick child, and the security guard insisted on the "blacklist", causing controversy
Recently, a dispute in the community has aroused widespread concern in the society. An anxious owner urgently needed to be taken to the hospital because of a sudden high fever in his child, but was turned away by the community security guards. The reason is that the owner had previously parked illegally and was included in the "blacklist" by the property. This seemingly simple dispute actually touches on the delicate balance between public order and individual rights and interests.
Illegal parking was "blacked", and the owner was blocked from sending sick children urgently
It is understood that on the day of the incident, Mr. Li, the owner of the community, found that the child had a high fever and was in a hurry and was ready to drive to the bottom of the corridor to pick up the child and send him to the hospital. However, the security guard refused to open the door for Mr. Li on the grounds that he had parked illegally. A verbal altercation ensued, which escalated into a physical altercation, with the security guard falling to the ground and calling the police. When the police arrived at the scene, the security guard insisted that Mr. Li solve the parking problem before allowing him to take the child to the hospital.
Property response: Helpless to maintain order
In response to this matter, the property company responded quickly. According to the property, parking is not allowed on the ground in the community to ensure the order and safety of the public space. If the owner needs to temporarily enter to pick up the elderly and children, he needs to leave as soon as possible. Mr. Li not only parked his car in the community in violation of regulations, but also occupied the fire escape, and did not move the car in time after persuasion. As a result, the property had no choice but to put it on a "blacklist" and prohibit its vehicles from re-entering the community.
Security machinery implementation regulations, what is the human touch?
Although the explanation of the property is reasonable, many netizens still expressed their dissatisfaction with the behavior of the security guards. They believe that in the face of the safety of children's lives, any regulations should be compromised. Security is too mechanical, impersonal and inflexible. Especially when the police have already arrived, they are still entangled in the parking problem, which undoubtedly exacerbates the anxiety of parents.
The owner is responsible for his own problems
However, there are also voices pointing out that Mr. Li also has certain problems. As the owner of the community, he should understand and abide by the rules of the community. Knowing that he could not stop overnight, he still insisted on doing it, which eventually led to being included in the "blacklist". Therefore, Mr. Li's predicament when picking up the child was not so much the unkindness of the security guards as the consequences of his own actions.
How to balance public order and individual rights and interests?
This incident is not just a simple dispute, but also a deep reflection on how to balance public order and individual rights. How to ensure that the legitimate rights and interests of property owners are not infringed upon while maintaining public order in the community? How to flexibly handle the contradiction between the regulations and the actual situation in the face of special circumstances? These are all issues that we need to think about and explore.
Conclusion: Under the rules, there needs to be a human temperature
Rules are the cornerstone of maintaining social order, but in the process of implementation, we should also fully consider the actual situation and needs of individuals. We need to find a balance between rules and human feelings, which not only ensures the stability of public order, but also reflects care and respect for individuals. Only in this way can our society be more harmonious and beautiful.
In this case, we hope that the relevant departments can conduct an in-depth investigation and handle it fairly. At the same time, it also calls on the majority of owners and property management personnel to strengthen communication and understanding, and jointly create a warm and harmonious community environment. For each of us, we should consciously abide by social rules, respect the rights and interests of others, and jointly maintain social harmony and stability.