Mr. Li, a citizen, as a long-term rental user of a parking space in the community, was labeled a "parking violation notice" for parking his car in the charging space of his community. According to the content on the list, if Mr. Li "violates parking" two more times, he will be included in the "blacklist" and prohibited from entering the community parking lot!
I believe that many fuel car owners have encountered the problem of parking difficulties, and now it seems that even if it is a paid long-term parking space, it is difficult to completely solve this old problem. The most infuriating thing is that the car owners have simply "turned a blind eye" to the decision to rebuild charging spaces in the community - neither asking for opinions in advance, discussing countermeasures, nor setting a reasonable transition period.
Electric vehicles are indeed the direction of development we are pursuing, but while making full use of the "new" energy, should we also be sympathetic to the parking needs of some of the fuel "old friends"? We must not blindly pursue formalism and allow the use of parking spaces in the community to be "seriously unbalanced".
In fact, the number of mechanical parking spaces in Mr. Li's community far exceeds that of flat parking spaces, but the former has strict restrictions on the length, width, height and weight of the models, and many models are difficult to control, resulting in a very low utilization rate. It can be seen that in order to increase the number of parking spaces, the practice of rigidly setting up mechanical parking spaces is not advisable.
Especially after the community rebuilt the original flat parking spaces into charging parking spaces on a large scale, the remaining area for ordinary fuel vehicles to park is even tighter, and the dilemma of "after the evening rush hour, there are less than 5 ordinary flat parking spaces left" in Mr. Li's community is the best footnote.
We should understand that a virtuous energy transition requires a gradual and smooth transition. If the pursuit of digital management and "one-size-fits-all" alone will exacerbate conflicts and cause dissatisfaction, how can we talk about building a low-carbon city? In fact, as long as there is more communication and humane consideration, it is not difficult for fuel vehicle owners and electric vehicle owners to "coexist peacefully".
The ratio of fuel parking spaces to electric parking spaces should never make residents "slip on the wheels". As a news blogger, I call on developers and community properties to listen more to public opinions, be considerate of people's feelings, and adopt reasonable and effective transitional arrangements. For example, before setting up a charging space to pay for fees, set up a period of publicity and warning periods, and it is not appropriate to take a "quick knife to cut the mess" type of violation treatment for those owners who have been abiding by the rules and regulations for a long time.
This is not just a parking problem, but also a microcosm of the "old" and "new" energy transition in urban development. The energy sector has always been a sensitive topic, which requires refined management and standardized operation.
We need to establish a more reasonable regulatory mechanism to avoid sudden chaos such as "bicycle governance chaos" at the energy level, and to do a good job in top-level design and risk avoidance from the source, and coordinate the energy consumption structure and urban development pattern. Only by respecting the vital interests of every citizen and fully responding to their demands can urban development be stable and far-reaching and win the hearts and minds of the people.
These measures will facilitate the positive interaction between electricity and oil, and make urban life full of joy and warmth. We need to embrace new energy, but at the same time, we should also let old friends have a warm harbor where they can live. Make urban development more inclusive and humane.