In recent years, in order to solve the problems of fragmentation of contracted land and the decentralization of cultivated land, some localities on the mainland have adopted a series of measures related to farmland transformation and construction. The initial policy proposed for the pilot project was "one household, one field".
On the one hand, the work of confirming land rights in the village is solid, and the people in the village are very willing, and everyone is willing to collect the original land for collective integration, and finally distribute it to households according to the original registered cultivated land area, so as to realize a piece of farmland per household.
However, at the same time as promoting this pilot measure, some villagers also had doubts, and they were also asking whether the rural areas should give ownership to the peasants by promoting one household and one field?
Judging from the policies of the pilot projects in various places. The policy of one household and one land does not mean that the ownership of land belongs to the peasants, and the ownership of the land is still owned by the state and village collectives, and the peasants still only have the right to use and contract management. The purpose of the one-household-one-field transformation program is to make better use of land resources, improve agricultural production efficiency, and promote rural economic development. So, don't get me wrong.
To put it simply, the policy of one household and one field on a pilot basis in various localities is carried out on the premise that the land ownership and the area of the second round of land allocation remain unchanged, and the main thing is to integrate the originally scattered land, so that each peasant household can have a relatively concentrated piece of land, which is convenient for them to carry out agricultural production.
In addition, our country also said in the guidance issued by our country that it is not allowed to take advantage of the opportunity to solve the fragmentation of cultivated land to disrupt and redivide rural land. These are principles that must be upheld.
To tell the truth, the exploration of "one household and one field" in rural areas is a measure to benefit the people, which is conducive to the mainland's promotion of land intensification and large-scale agricultural development.
In the past, in rural areas, due to the decentralization of land, it was difficult for farmers to achieve large-scale agricultural production activities, and most of them were completed by manpower. By transforming farmland from one household to one field and allocating farmland to households, farmland can be concentrated and contiguous, and farmers can make better use of modern agricultural technology and equipment to improve agricultural production efficiency, reduce production costs, and increase agricultural income.
Of course, although the pilot project has been organized in various places, in the process of the pilot, there are still some villages facing challenges, because the exchange of land involves the interests of farmers, but also related to the fertility of the land, in the process of promotion, some villagers feel unfair, resulting in a village can not be successfully piloted.
Therefore, the current problem is to find a way to balance the interests of different farmers and ensure the fair distribution of land, and these problems need to be coordinated by all localities before exploring the pilot project.
In short, the implementation of the one-household-one-land policy is not about giving land ownership to farmers. Rather, it is to make better use of land resources, improve agricultural production efficiency, and promote rural economic development.
If, in the process of implementation, farmers feel that the plan is not suitable, they can also refuse, because the decision and choice to solve the problem of fragmentation of contracted land and the decentralization of cultivated land are in their own hands. The mainland has also stressed on many occasions that it is not allowed to implement plans against the wishes of the peasants, and everyone can rest assured of this. Okay, that's all I have to answer for you, what do you think about this?