It is really sad that the M7 PLUS in Yuncheng, Shanxi Province, was driving on the highway, and unfortunately rear-ended the maintenance vehicle caused a fire, resulting in the loss of precious lives of the three people. After this incident, due to the serious casualties caused, it quickly attracted widespread attention and discussion.
The M7 collided and caught fire
Judging from the discussion, most of the general concerns of the industry and netizens lie in the issue of safety. At present, Wenjie Automobile, Shanxi Traffic Control Group, Shanxi Expressway Traffic Police and other parties have responded to the matter.
The Q Jie said that he was deeply saddened by the casualties in the accident. At the same time, the vehicle was traveling at a speed of 115 kilometers per hour at the time of the accident, the airbag was opened normally, and the characteristics of the electric power battery pack were normal.
It should be said that the response from the question industry has, to a certain extent, answered the questions that netizens are concerned about, such as whether the vehicle spontaneously combusted and whether the airbag was opened when the car accident occurred.
Ask the world to respond
Although we have synthesized the responses to this question from all sides so far. It is worth noting that one of the questions that netizens are more concerned about is why the intelligent driving system has not played a role.
After all, in the previous publicity process, the "intelligent driving system" equipped with the M7 PLUS can be said to be deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. So why didn't the system work in the event of an accident?
In fact, some netizens who claimed to be the family members of the deceased with the online name "Three Mu Mu" also raised relevant questions in their posts, that is, AEB automatic emergency braking, GAEB special-shaped obstacle automatic emergency braking, when the accident occurred, did these functions work?
The family of the deceased questioned
According to media reports, in this regard, Wenjie said that the vehicle involved was not an intelligent driving version of the vehicle and was not equipped with Huawei's high-end intelligent driving assistance system.
At the same time, the question also said that the vehicle involved was equipped with a Bosch program. However, at the time of the collision, the vehicle's speed was well beyond the trigger range of the Bosch AEB.
Obviously, the response of the question industry responds to the question of "why the intelligent driving system does not play a role" that netizens are concerned about. At the same time, it also pointed out why AEB did not play a role.
Ask the world to respond
It is worth noting that although the question was so answered, Bosch later denied this statement in its response.
In its response, Bosch made it clear that the vehicle involved was not equipped with the Bosch Intelligent Driving System (including AEB). At the same time, Bosch also expressed its sorrow and condolences for the occurrence of the accident.
This makes people more confused, as the brand owner of the vehicle involved, is it not clear what kind of scheme the vehicle involved is carrying?
Bosch issued a statement denying it
If it is clear about the relevant configurations of the vehicles involved, then why does Bosch, as one of the world's leading automotive technology suppliers, clearly deny that it is equipped with Bosch intelligent driving systems including AEB?
I think this is a question worth thinking about and a question worth figuring out. After all, in this process, whether the relevant functions of the vehicles involved have played a corresponding role is an issue that everyone is more concerned about.
For this question, the relevant parties are bound to give a clear answer and explanation. This is also a responsible brand and should be responsible.
Video of the collision and fire
As of the publication of this article, Wenjie Auto has not officially responded to Bosch's response. We are constantly monitoring this.
In addition, it should be pointed out that the collision and fire accident of Shanxi Yuncheng Wenjie M7 PLUS is very distressing. As for issues such as why the vehicle caught fire and why the vehicle did not unlock automatically, there is still no clear and convincing statement.
Finally, the sales data of the models involved in this article are derived from the comprehensive sales data of the industry released by the third-party platform, and the data description of the third-party platform shows that it is displayed in strict accordance with the corresponding relationship between the sales volume and the platform announced by the Automobile Dealers Association and the manufacturer, with an accuracy rate of more than 99%, which is for reference only.
This article declares:
This article is the original article of the Cheyu World Operation Department, the total No. 11018, some of the pictures are from the Internet, and the data and related materials from the marked sources are all cited. Cheyu World Original All Rights Reserved, infringement must be investigated.