I saw an article today that made me angry and laugh.
The title of this article is: "Although it looks cost-effective to sell wheat and green reserves, the peasant brothers must understand the general situation and take the overall situation into account!"
Selling green savings, the farmer brothers earn 1,500 yuan per mu. If you wait until the wheat is ripe, after the harvest is completed, the income of one mu of wheat is about 1,200 yuan.
The accounts are very clear, and there is not only a difference in time and labor between selling green savings and selling wheat, but also a difference of 300 yuan. You must know that the monthly pension of the elderly in rural areas is only more than 100 yuan. The difference of 300 yuan per mu of land is a large expense for rural people.
However, even so, some people openly demanded that the peasants understand the general situation, take into account the overall situation, and refrain from selling green reserves and wheat.
May I ask, have you considered the feelings of the peasants when you make such a righteous and awe-inspiring request, and who will be responsible for the peasants' losses?
The self-media author wrote righteously: I have worked hard to grow to maturity, but I cut and sell green storage fodder, and I don't respect the fruits of farmers' labor.
It's hilarious:
First, does the farmer himself who sells the green savings not respect the fruits of the peasants' own labor?
Second, what is respect for the fruits of labor? Is it a higher income? Is it respecting the peasants to lower the peasants' income? Isn't this nonsense?
There is nothing wrong with protecting food security, but we cannot afford to lose those who protect it. If they contribute to the protection of food security, should farmers who are aware of the bigger picture be rewarded for having higher incomes?
In the same way that farmers are not allowed to plant cash crops, they are not allowed to sell green reserves.
Farmers in a village in Hezhou, Guangxi, were planting in the fields when they were stopped by the staff of the relevant departments.
The explanation of the police at the police station was that he did not grow corn, but tea. We must maintain order and clean up non-grain crops......
The explanation of the staff of the town government is that it is necessary to strictly implement the protection of cultivated land and carry out non-grain rectification. If it's arable land, and you grow tea on it, it's against the policy. Tea is not a food crop......
In fact, there are many similar situations in various parts of the country where farmers are forbidden to grow cash crops and only grain is allowed to grow. For example, ginger is not allowed in a certain place, orchids are not allowed in a certain place, and so on, forcing farmers to pull out the ginger and orchids that have already been planted and grow grain instead.
However, farmers who grow cash crops have high returns, while those who grow food have low returns. Excuse me, if farmers are forced to grow food, who will be responsible for their losses?
Isn't it obvious bullying to force farmers to grow low-income grain?
A few decades ago, when the reform and opening up was just carried out, farmers had the freedom to plant, and they could freely choose to plant cash crops, and many places began to build greenhouses to grow vegetables or medicinal herbs, so as to make a fortune quickly.
Even, for farmers who build greenhouses, the state also has financial and policy support. Many farmers have also benefited from this.
Today, why do the peasants suddenly lose the freedom to plant? Logically speaking, since the peasants are forced to grow grain, it is necessary to adjust the price of grain to ensure the peasants' profits. Otherwise, there is a suspicion of bullying the peasants.
Our country wants to build a market economy and society, and the most important function of the market economy is market regulation, and no one can force others. But where is the said good market regulation?
If the yield of growing grain is higher, do you still need to force it? The farmers themselves will switch to grain crops!
As long as it is not illegal, it is unreasonable to force others at any time. It's a pity that our relevant departments always habitually force the people to behave in a way.
Objectively speaking, the final solution is: sell the green reserve for 1,500 yuan per mu, then, if you don't sell the green reserve, the government will guarantee the minimum income of 2,000 yuan per mu, so that even the labor fee for collecting wheat will be covered. Then, let the people have already chosen whether to sell green storage or wheat.
For decades, it has been very difficult for our farmers. We should not always ask them to give, but we should give them fairness and justice!
If you give, you deserve to be rewarded, don't you?#春日生活打卡季#