In the first quarter of the public offering, the average monthly scale of non-goods was rearranged, and broad-based ETFs became "winners and losers"? 中基协近日公布了一季度各项资管业务月均规模数据，其中基金公司非货基金月均规模一项上，出现了不少新变化。
In the first quarter of the public offering, the average monthly scale of non-goods was rearranged, and broad-based ETFs became "winners and losers"? 数据显示，易方达基金、华夏基金和广发基金非货月均规模蝉联前三名。其中，一季度易方达基金的非货月均规模为10019.47亿元，这是继2022年四季度之后，其非货月均规模再次重回万亿元之上。紧随其后的是华夏基金和广发基金，一季度非货月均规模分别为8677.11亿元和6307.73亿元。
但是从环比变化来看，这三家基金公司中，华夏基金以环比14.47%的涨幅居于领先位置，易方达基金非货规模环比小幅增长3.35%，广发基金则下降了4.56%。
与2023年四季度相比，非货月均规模排名前十的基金公司名单并未发生变化，但排序却发生了调整。
嘉实基金以5863.76亿元的非货规模超越富国基金和招商基金，跃居第四位；博时基金一季度的非货管理突破5000亿元，达到5266.55亿元，排名也从去年四季度末的第8名前进至第7名。
与2023年四季度末相比，富国基金、招商基金、南方基金、汇添富基金和鹏华基金的非货管理规模均有不同程度地下降，其中汇添富基金非货规模环比下降8.44%，在排名前十的基金公司中降幅最大。
非货月均规模排在11～20名的基金公司中，座次调整更加明显。
首先，永赢基金凭借2621.4亿元的非货规模，时隔半年多后再次“回归”榜单，排在第20名，而中欧基金则在本次排名中不见踪影。
数据显示，华泰柏瑞基金一季度非货管理规模突破3000亿元大关，达到3311.73亿元，较上季度末增长了31.83%，排名也从第20名上升至第12名。中银基金在一季度末非货规模超越兴证全球基金，达到2787.19亿元。
其余排在第11～20位基金公司，其非货规模较2023年四季度末均有所下滑。
从本次排名变化来看，宽基ETF或成为基金公司非货管理规模的“胜负手”。
同花顺iFinD数据显示，一季度资金净流入规模排名前五的ETF分别是易方达沪深300ETF发起式、华泰柏瑞沪深300ETF、嘉实沪深300ETF、华夏沪深300ETF和南方中证500ETF，一季度资金净流入规模分别为809.34亿元、587.34亿元、584.28亿元、553.6亿元和295.46亿元。而这几只宽基ETF的基金管理公司，一季度的非货管理规模环比均出现上涨。
此外，中基协此次还公布了以下几项资管业务的最新数据：
In the first quarter of the public offering, the average monthly scale of non-goods was rearranged, and broad-based ETFs became "winners and losers"? In the first quarter of the public offering, the average monthly scale of non-goods was rearranged, and broad-based ETFs became "winners and losers"? In the first quarter of the public offering, the average monthly scale of non-goods was rearranged, and broad-based ETFs became "winners and losers"? In the first quarter of the public offering, the average monthly scale of non-goods was rearranged, and broad-based ETFs became "winners and losers"? In the first quarter of the public offering, the average monthly scale of non-goods was rearranged, and broad-based ETFs became "winners and losers"? In the first quarter of the public offering, the average monthly scale of non-goods was rearranged, and broad-based ETFs became "winners and losers"? In the first quarter of the public offering, the average monthly scale of non-goods was rearranged, and broad-based ETFs became "winners and losers"? 
