Bruce Lee, no honor in the ring, no certification of the Guinness Book of Records. But why is it still rumored to be a myth in the folk, even to the point of being mythologized?
It even led many people to believe that Bruce Lee could beat Tyson without rules!
If you only talk about influence, but do not discuss the victory and defeat of these two people, I am afraid that Bruce Lee is greater than Tyson: basketball shoes will produce Bruce Lee color matching but will not produce Tyson color matching, no matter the Film Critics agencies in the East and West, magazines in the selection of the best action movie, it is difficult to bypass "Dragon Fight Tiger Fight". The film, on the other hand, is actually to promote Bruce Lee's martial arts philosophy.
As the protagonist in "Dragon Fight tiger fight", Bruce Lee used the trick of attacking the villain, which seems "disdainful" in traditional martial arts; the last classic mirror battle is also for the purpose of pointing out the martial arts philosophy dialogue between Bruce Lee and the abbot at the beginning of the movie. So I prefer to believe that Bruce Lee was actually a martial arts philosopher whose theory was completely new, different from karate, taekwondo. To be sure, at least, bruce Lee's theory does provide the theoretical basis for mMA projects like the modern UFC. Taking a step back ten thousand steps, he provided ideas for many subsequent mixed martial arts: human fighting is to use any means to put the other party to death, rather than just using a sect technique, as long as it is easy to use, then it can be used by me.
Bruce Lee's first identity was that of a philosopher. In this respect, the difference between him and Tyson is like the difference between Marx and Lenin.
But at the same time, because he had to explore a theory, Bruce Lee did train his body to the limit: because both martial arts philosophy and ideological philosophy need a foundation, and the basis of ideological philosophy is social phenomena, social performance; Bruce Lee's martial arts philosophy not only observes others, but also has his own observation. It can even be said that truncated boxing is completely his own set of philosophies developed for his own body. For example: late start first, this is actually not practical for many big men, it is impossible, but Bruce Lee is fast, he can be late first, and his characteristics are also fast. Bruce Lee's strength is not like many boxers, according to many people's recollections, because of the obsession with inch boxing, Bruce Lee has great bowl power, many people say: "Bruce Lee wants to train to become the world wrist wrestling champion", he develops his body according to his own tricks, and develops his own philosophy according to his body and moves, according to his own philosophy and hands-on practice, increase his own moves, and so on. After all, Bruce Lee also believed in the fact that the legs were not waist, but he did change this "be water" according to his philosophy!
Although Bruce Lee has no record, I think it must be clear that he has indeed trained his body to the limit, and because he modified his body according to his own moves, it is not fair to him to have to let me come up with hard data: because Tyson is a boxer, there are norms and standards in boxing to measure him, but Bruce Lee himself should not be measured by data, and a lot of his data is meaningless, for reasons I have stated above. We just need to know that he is indeed the peak of the warrior's body.
Although there is no data: but we can still see some clues, Bruce Lee's performance of single-finger push-ups, two-finger push-ups, inch fists, these are basically not in the previous Western fitness system, so if you talk about the strength of the boxing, it is completely by the standard of boxing to judge him, in fact, even if his forehand boxing strength is not as good as the heavyweight boxing king, but the heavyweight boxer has his finger strength, wrist strength? Of course, many people think that wrist strength and finger strength can affect personal fighting? That's naturally because everyone doesn't understand Bruce Lee's moves and philosophies. In his philosophy, the wrists and fingers are the most dagger-like of the human body, so in Tangshan Big Brother, his trick to kill the boss is to stab the villain with his finger, and I think he should do the same in the real world; the inch fist is very powerful in close-quarters fighting, and after he performed the inch fist, this technique was taken by many professional boxers.
My logic is that from the video data, other people's dictations, and sporadic data, we can see that his physical strength is at its peak, and on this basis: because he has established his own set of martial arts theories completely according to the demands of his own fighting, and the body built according to this philosophy cannot be measured by the standards of any sport in the world. People simply can't measure Tyson by the standards he measures, that is, things like punches. Of course, Bruce Lee's power is definitely a presence that transcends his own heavyweight.
Since he is the peak of physical fitness, Tyson is also the peak of physical fitness. The techniques and tactics of these two people are completely different, the way of fighting is also different, and the two did not fight at the peak of their various places. Then who will win and who will lose is unknown, the subject said: people think that Bruce Lee can beat Tyson, naturally it is also a false proposition; but many of the answers are not advisable, because Tyson's great achievements in the all-chicken ring think that Tyson will be able to defeat Bruce Lee.
Can Bruce Lee ever beat Tyson in an irregular street fight. It's also an unknown, so why do so many people believe bruce Lee can beat Tyson? I think there's something wrong with that in itself, because people who aren't Bruce Lee fans will most likely choose Tyson to win when they see a duel between these two people!
There is no doubt that Tyson is the peak of human physical fitness, and it needs no further mention. What people may not know or despise is Tyson's leg strength. However, Tyson's lower set and running can be seen that Tyson's leg strength is not weak. At the same time, in addition to Tyson's huge fist strength, it can be called the highest in human beings, and his reaction ability is also unique, which can be seen from his dodging.
Bruce Lee's strength, speed, and reflexes at the Kung Fu Show were also top notch. With the inch punch to fly ordinary people good dormy, speed has always been Bruce Lee's specialty, 7 punches a second, Tyson according to statistics a second 4 punches? Reactions need not be said more, and the first to go is based on reactions and judgments. Of course, Bruce Lee's ability to resist blows is in doubt, and I don't know if he has practiced hard qigong? After practicing, I don't think Tyson is strong enough to resist blows.
Bruce Lee's advantage is leg skills, basically in normal street fights, legs are more useful than fists, because the legs are longer, and it is also the most powerful part of the human body, Bruce Lee's legs dare to call the second I am afraid that there are not many people in the world who dare to call the first, right?
The second advantage is that his martial arts theory system was originally created for irregular street fighting. It not only knows the deadly parts of the human body, but also fully develops its fists and legs, and its strength and speed are superior. Even compared to the UFC, his theory is more suited to street fighting and more suited to killing people. Judging from the theory presented in his films, Bruce Lee is not only good at ground techniques and locking skills, but also regards attacking key parts of the human body as part of the martial arts system.
Tyson's disadvantage also lies in this, he specializes in boxing, more believe in his own fists, I also doubt that he will subconsciously superstitiously believe in his fists, in addition, he does not understand the deadly parts of the human body like a special soldier, even if he knows, he may subconsciously not let himself attack there, because - occupational disease, just like professional drivers will subconsciously leave a gap when turning right. Secondly, Tyson is not good at using his legs, and his projects are compared to UFC, which leads to uneven development of his development, and the leg method is also used freely.
One of the disadvantages of street fights for Tyson is that street fights are different from the ring, the stage is infinitely large, which means that Bruce Lee has unlimited room for maneuver, and Tyson's locking skills are not brilliant, and Bruce Lee is more flexible than himself. More like a tank that was kitted out by Bruce Lee with its legs?
The disadvantage to Bruce Lee is its fault tolerance rate, but when Bruce Lee enters the close-quarters fighting stage, Tyson can use his weight advantage to suppress Bruce Lee, and Tyson can use more powerful punching strength to punch KO Bruce Lee. Tyson brings a full set of KO to a whole bunch of heavyweights, and Bruce Lee is not to mention.
In fact, just comparing the book data, since the fights all agree that these two people are the peak of physical fitness, why is there a one-sided statement? g Not to mention that the master's moves are often changing rapidly, and the victory or defeat is tied to an arrow. If the goal is to kill each other, any mistake by Tyson and Bruce Lee will cost their lives.
Many people think that Tyson can undoubtedly win, either as brainless and illogical as thinking that Bruce Lee must win, or it is a blowing Tyson, Bruce Lee does not mention a word. Obviously, none of this has logic. But even the most rigorous logical comparison and analysis of the two can never predict who will lose and who will win, just as no one can think that Barcelona will be hacked and Scythians will be able to kill Persia. For now, if a 100 percent correct result can be obtained by logical analysis, then the world can replace war with arithmetic, the game does not have to be fought, and all competitive sports have lost their meaning. And as I said above, in the absence of a large gap (not a difference) between the two, it is a game of summary and life and death, and the victory or defeat is likely to be tied to an arrow. No one can predict where it will really go. So aren't those who judge Tyson's triumph by virtue of his physique as ridiculous as the group of people they think Bruce Lee will win?