laitimes

The user stole the gas and the gas company stole the gas! Only the state officials were allowed to set fires, and the people were not allowed to light the lights!

author:沐姐

The difference between the user stealing the gas and the gas company stealing the gas is really only allowed to be set on fire by the state officials, and the people are not allowed to light the lamps!

It's outrageous that the double standard has reached such a point.

1. If the user steals gas, he or she will face severe punishment under the law, and may even be sentenced. However, gas companies steal gas, but they often make a hasty decision with a sentence of "operation error".

2. When will the unfairness of gas companies adjusting prices at will with a monopoly position, while users can only bear it silently?

3. In order to pursue profits, gas companies even do not hesitate to sacrifice the interests of users, this kind of overbearing behavior is unbearable.

4. Users may have to steal gas in order to survive, while gas companies blatantly steal gas for profit, this contrast is chilling.

5. Why can't the misconduct of gas companies not only harm the rights and interests of users, but also undermine the market order?

6. Stealing gas by users is regarded as a crime, while stealing gas by gas companies is regarded as a "normal phenomenon", which is unacceptable.

The user stole the gas and the gas company stole the gas! Only the state officials were allowed to set fires, and the people were not allowed to light the lights!

7. The hypocrisy of gas companies restricting the use of gas by users on the grounds of "safety" while ignoring their own safety responsibilities is disgusting.

8. The opacity of gas companies refusing to disclose gas costs on the grounds of "trade secrets" is questionable when users may have to steal gas in order to survive.

9. The injustice of gas companies raising prices at will on the grounds of "market rules" while users are unable to enjoy the benefits brought by the market, which is infuriating.

10. Stealing gas by users is regarded as a crime, while gas companies stealing gas is regarded as a "normal phenomenon", which is unacceptable.

11. The hypocrisy of gas companies restricting the use of gas by customers on the grounds of "safety" while ignoring their own safety responsibilities is disgusting.

12. The opacity of gas companies refusing to disclose gas costs on the grounds of "trade secrets" is questionable when users may have to steal gas in order to survive.

13. The injustice of gas companies raising prices arbitrarily on the grounds of "market rules" while users are not able to enjoy the benefits brought by the market is infuriating.

14. Stealing gas by users is regarded as a crime, while gas companies stealing gas is regarded as a "normal phenomenon", which is unacceptable.

15. It's disgusting hypocrisy for gas companies to restrict the use of gas by their customers on the grounds of "safety" while ignoring their own safety responsibilities.

16. The opacity of gas companies refusing to disclose gas costs, citing "trade secrets", is questionable when users may have to steal gas in order to survive.

17. The injustice of gas companies raising prices arbitrarily on the grounds of "market rules" while users are not able to enjoy the benefits of the market is infuriating.

The user stole the gas and the gas company stole the gas! Only the state officials were allowed to set fires, and the people were not allowed to light the lights!

18. Stealing gas by users is regarded as a crime, while gas companies stealing gas is regarded as a "normal phenomenon", which is unacceptable.

19. The hypocrisy of gas companies restricting the use of gas by users on the grounds of "safety" while ignoring their own safety responsibilities is disgusting.

20. The opacity of gas companies refusing to disclose gas costs on the grounds of "trade secrets" is questionable when users may have to steal gas in order to survive.

21. The injustice of gas companies raising prices arbitrarily on the grounds of "market rules" while users are unable to enjoy the benefits of the market is infuriating.

22. Stealing gas by users is regarded as a crime, while gas companies stealing gas is regarded as a "normal phenomenon", which is unacceptable.

23. It is disgusting that gas companies restrict the use of gas by their customers on the grounds of "safety" while ignoring their own safety responsibilities.

24. The opacity of gas companies refusing to disclose gas costs on the grounds of "trade secrets" is questionable when consumers may have to steal gas in order to survive.

25. The injustice of gas companies raising prices arbitrarily on the grounds of "market rules" while users are unable to enjoy the benefits of the market is infuriating.

26. Stealing gas by users is considered a crime, while gas companies stealing gas is regarded as a "normal phenomenon", which is unacceptable.

27. It is disgusting to see the hypocrisy of gas companies restricting the use of gas by their customers on the grounds of "safety" while ignoring their own safety responsibilities.

The user stole the gas and the gas company stole the gas! Only the state officials were allowed to set fires, and the people were not allowed to light the lights!

28. The opacity of gas companies refusing to disclose gas costs on the grounds of "trade secrets" is questionable when users may have to steal gas in order to survive.

29. The injustice of gas companies raising prices arbitrarily on the grounds of "market rules" while users are not able to enjoy the benefits of the market is infuriating.

30. Stealing gas by users is regarded as a crime, while gas companies stealing gas is regarded as a "normal phenomenon", which is unacceptable.

31. It is disgusting that gas companies restrict the use of gas by consumers on the grounds of "safety", while ignoring their own safety responsibilities.

32. The opacity of gas companies refusing to disclose gas costs on the grounds of "trade secrets" is questionable when consumers may have to steal gas in order to survive.

33. Gas companies arbitrarily raise prices on the grounds of "market rules", but users cannot

Read on