Preface
The rule of law government is the inevitable requirement of governing the country according to the law, the service-oriented government is the inevitable requirement of serving the people, and the administration according to law and the use of power for the people are all too obvious things, but Inner Mongolia Kailu's "paying the money before farming" runs counter to this, and the harm of bureaucracy to the people cannot be underestimated.
Brief events
Recently, the incident of "paying money before farming" in Shuangsheng Village, Kailu County, Inner Mongolia caused a sensation on the whole network, in which Ji Yunhao, deputy secretary of the town party committee and member of the political and legal committee who "does not understand the law", was suspended, and the village secretary and deputy director were seriously warned by the party. The core of the incident is whether the "supplementary contract fee" is legal and reasonable, and the powder keg of the incident is concentrated on the bureaucracy displayed by the local town and village cadres.
Should there be a "supplementary contract fee"?
In essence, it is a legal issue, according to the provisions of the Civil Code, if there is a major change in the content of the matters agreed in the contract of the civil actor, the two parties can negotiate to change the content of the contract according to the actual situation, and if one party does not agree, the other party can actually achieve it through litigation or arbitration.
In this case, the term of the land contract was 30 years, and the changes between 2004 and the present are too great, regardless of economic and social development, price conditions, land quality, etc., if the 2004 standard is used to implement the contract, it is obviously unfair to the lessor. The contractor has spent a lot of manpower, financial and material resources to improve the soil, which is an estimated account, and the subsequent supplementary contract can take into account the actual situation, take into account the interests of both parties, and maximize the fairness as much as possible.
Should farming be discouraged?
Since there have been major changes in the stiplate matters in the contract and they need to be adjusted in order to be more fair, why can't we coordinate and resolve the matter in advance, but instead adopt the crude method of blocking spring plowing and sowing? Moreover, it is the town and village cadres who lead people to obstruct it, which not only delays the agricultural time, but also intensifies the contradictions and seriously damages the relationship between the party and the masses and between the cadres and the masses. "People are wrong for a while, and people are wrong for a year", it is too unreasonable to block farming.
Should the rudeness and barbarism of town and village cadres be?
Since the core is a civil legal issue, the cost of consultation should be resolved through the law, rather than simply adopting the method of administrative compulsory intervention, and there must be a basis and standard for compulsory collection of fees, and whether the local basis and standard are tenable? Political and legal committee members "do not understand the law," and village cadres do not speak of the law; although officials and senior officials crush people to death, and town and village cadres have bitter intentions, we cannot be careless on the issue of serving the people or serving the higher levels; if we use chicken feathers as an arrow, we will miss the peasant time, and we will harm the interests of the masses.
Central media comment
People's Daily Online released a hot comment entitled ""Farming to pay money" incident, what lessons need to be learned", the comments hit the nail on the head, to the point, you know, what does it mean for a village to be on the People's Network, if it is a good thing, it is naturally a great honor, on the contrary, if it is a negative event, the impact will be doubled.
People's Daily Online commented: "The lights are not clear, and the reason is not clear." "Only by putting the details on the table can we answer questions more effectively and convince the public. Is there any dereliction of duty in the process of land management at the county, town, and village levels? If we fail to stop it when we should have done so, and only then do we think of stopping it when the situation has reached a point where it is impossible to get out of the way, and it is undoubtedly not a responsible way to do so.
As a political and legal cadre, Ji Yunhao said that he "does not understand the law"; not only did he not uphold justice, but instead stood on the opposite side of the law, "preventing peasants from cultivating land and forcibly demanding that cars be detained; his words and deeds not only deviated from the political character that officials should have, but also hurt the image of public power in the hearts of the masses." Farming does not wait for anyone, farming time does not wait for people, spring plowing and preparation must seize the agricultural time, and there can be no delay.
Netizen comments
Some netizens said: "We are poor, but we are not stupid; The wasteland is uncultivated, and there are people fighting for fertilizer; Really, if you can make money from farming, the peasants will have no land to plant." "Why should peasant households stop the cultivation of wasteland at their own expense?" "Once power falls into the hands of hooligans, it will be a disaster for the people"; "Since the nature of land use has been changed, why didn't the contract be terminated before, and why does it not violate the contract now that you have paid 200 yuan?" You can continue to grow grain......
Judging from the reactions of netizens, the following meanings were mainly expressed: First, since there has been a change in the nature of the land, isn't the local land supervision dereliction of duty? Second, the transformation of wasteland into fertile land is not all a bad thing; no matter from which angle you look at it, the benefits of turning saline-alkali land into fertile soil in this incident are in front of you, so why can't it be icing on the cake? Why should we sprinkle salt on the wound? Third, the problems of cadres bureaucracy and disregard for the interests of the masses reflected in the "Yunhao Stop Farming" are still quite conspicuous, and this must be resolutely curbed.
Personal opinion
With regard to problems left over from history, new officials cannot ignore old accounts, let alone let the problems exist, and still less intensify the contradictions in the problems. Originally, it was necessary to use the power in one's hands to rudely intervene in matters that were fair to all parties in accordance with the law, which not only did not help, but harmed others and oneself, and it can be said that the gains outweighed the losses.
If there is a deviation in the understanding of this issue and the direction is wrong, the faster you run, the greater the mistake. In particular, the words and deeds of grassroots politicians are closely related to the vital interests of the people, and they cannot but be cautious.
What do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss!