When the spring ploughing season comes, the farmers are busy with their work, and this spring ploughing is related to their annual income. In a village in Jianhua Town, Kailu County, Inner Mongolia, the incident in which the village cadres did not allow the villagers to cultivate the farms and the town cadres brought people to obstruct it became a hot spot on the Internet, causing widespread concern.
Loading...
These villagers have contracted a piece of saline-alkali land, that piece of land has no grass, potholes, some pits are even two or three meters deep, five yuan a mu and no one wants to rent, they signed a contract with Zhengfu is 30 years, from 2004 to 2034, now 20 years have passed, spent a lot of manpower, material and financial resources, finally boiled over, this year to start farming.
The total contract cost for 30 years is 156,080, and when it is divided into 5,226 yuan a year, it is actually 5,607 mu, so this is 9 cents a year for an acre, even if it is calculated according to 110 mu of arable land, the contract fee for each mu a year is more than 47 yuan, and this price is extremely cheap.
The farmer claimed that no one had contracted for five yuan per mu, but the fact was that he himself did not contract, and they paid for less than one dollar. Of the more than 5,000 acres of land, there are only 110 acres of arable land, 413 acres of forest land, and the rest is what the villagers call saline-alkali land, a land where no grass grows.
Is it obviously illegal, because Article 342 of the Criminal Law stipulates that a large amount of land cannot be changed into cultivated land without authorization, and the original cultivated land was only 110 mu, but now the villagers have expanded to 5,000 mu.
Moreover, according to other peasant households, after these villagers turned the original saline-alkali land and other places into fertile land, the yield per mu of land was as high as 17,800 catties, nearly two tons, and in the past 20 years, the land must have gradually increased from 110 mu to 5,000 mu today, so that these villagers made a lot of money, so that they thought that they could continue to improve, so there was a situation where one family invested one or two million.
The village cadres also helped these villagers calculate an account to see how much money they could earn every year from 5,000 mu of fertile land. Excluding the cost of manpower and machinery, the cost per mu is about 500 yuan, calculated according to the selling price of one piece of corn per catty, and the output of 1,600 catties per mu, then the net income per mu is about 1,000 and fourteen, and the annual net income is 5,000 times 14 for 7 million, not to mention the first 20 years, even if it is calculated in the next ten years, it is enough for them to earn 70 million.
Moreover, Article 6 of the contract states that the contractor is not allowed to change the use of the land during the contract period, and can only transfer, lease, mortgage or inherit the land on the premise of ensuring the number of dairy cattle and within the time limit. So the original 110 acres of cultivated land has become 5,000 acres today, isn't this a violation of the contract?
Wu Zhaoxiang, president of the Supreme People's Court's Environmental Resources Division, also said that grassroots organizations do not have the right to change the nature and use of land without authorization, which is also a crime of illegal land occupation.
However, in the document on the reward and subsidy measures for social capital to participate in land consolidation projects, in the standard of reward and subsidy funds in Article 4, it is clearly stated that the standard of dry land is 510,000 yuan per hectare, that is, 510,000 yuan for 15 acres of land, so one mu of land is more than 30,000 yuan, and 5,000 mu of land is a reward of more than 100 million yuan.
Not to mention more than 30,000 acres of land, Gansu's 100,000 acres of land improvement project, a subsidy of 3,000 per mu, rent-free for 20 years, Xinjiang is also a subsidy of 1,000 yuan per mu, the state is encouraging the improvement of saline-alkali land, but these villagers have taken the initiative to improve their rented land, but there is no state subsidy for a penny, from this aspect, the villagers are also indispensable.
For this incident, the follow-up depends on how the relevant departments deal with it, and people from all walks of life have different views on this matter, and they have their own views, so they can only wait for the follow-up report.