laitimes

The United States took the lead, the West collectively besieged China, the EU issued 4 challenges, and Chinese companies were "raided"

author:See the world in the vernacular

Under the leadership of the United States, the Western collective has "besieged" China, Chinese companies have been "raided", and the EU has issued four "challenge letters". What will be the consequences of the EU's "raid" on Chinese companies? and how will China respond?

On the morning of the 23rd, the offices of a Chinese company in Poland and the Netherlands were suddenly raided by the EU side without notice, and the company's information equipment and employees' mobile phones were controlled on the spot, office documents were checked and relevant data was requested. The EU side reasoned that there were "indications" that the inspected company might have received foreign subsidies that could distort the internal market under the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR). The EU's behavior of engaging in a "surprise attack" without greeting is obviously aimed at China. Combined with the recent frequent attacks by the United States on the China issue and the unwarranted creation of excuses to sanction Chinese companies, it cannot be ruled out that the EU's "raid" on the offices of Chinese companies is another latest manifestation of the collective "siege" of China by the West under the leadership of the United States.

The United States took the lead, the West collectively besieged China, the EU issued 4 challenges, and Chinese companies were "raided"

Recently, some politicians in the United States have frequently hyped up the so-called "overcapacity" topic, especially in clean energy products, pointing directly at China's "new three" in the field of foreign trade, namely solar energy, electric vehicles and lithium batteries. In the eyes of the United States, a large part of the reason for the "overcapacity" of Chinese products is the so-called "government subsidies". And this is exactly the same reason why the EU "raided" Chinese companies. In addition, in the past two months, the EU has opened four related investigations under the framework of the Foreign Subsidies Regulation, all of which target Chinese companies, including solar energy, wind turbines and electric trains, all of which are related to China's new energy. These four investigations against Chinese enterprises can be regarded as four "challenge letters" to China. And this is obviously not a coincidence, that is, the EU intends to cooperate with the United States in the field of new energy to suppress and contain China.

The United States took the lead, the West collectively besieged China, the EU issued 4 challenges, and Chinese companies were "raided"

If the United States enlists its allies and does everything possible to suppress China and curb China's development in the field of new energy, is it only China that will be affected in the end? The answer is obviously not. It is important to know that China's new energy industry is committed to providing high-quality products for the global response to climate change, and has certainly made positive contributions to the green transformation of countries around the world, including the European Union. The United States and Europe are suppressing in every possible way, and they are also unable to get along with themselves. And it will further discredit the United States and Europe in the international community. For a long time, the United States and Europe have often used the excuses of "climate change and environmental protection" to challenge other countries, hold high the banner of responding to climate change and advocating green cooperation, and try their best to portray themselves as "environmental guardians". To put it bluntly, this is a blatant "double standard". Facts have proved that the United States and Europe are not "environmental guardians", but rather obstructors of the global green transition.

The United States took the lead, the West collectively besieged China, the EU issued 4 challenges, and Chinese companies were "raided"

Returning to the EU's "raid" on Chinese companies, if the EU really has any doubts about subsidies, it can be carried out through reasonable investigative means, but this kind of "raid" inspection without notice is obviously a hegemonic style, arrogant and rude, and regardless of our reaction, this is a very negative signal for those non-EU companies operating in Europe. They will certainly be worried that if this happens to them one day, it will obviously be a blow to the EU's business environment. In addition, for the United States and Europe, this hypocritical and double-standard behavior of suppressing and curbing China's clean technology is also a kind of "economic self-harm". The United States wants to protect and promote its own green industry, and then suppress China's green industry in every way, but the fact is that the clean technology industry in the United States is withering, and investors have begun to abandon the production of clean technology products in the United States. In response to the above-mentioned actions of the United States and Europe, He Yadong, spokesperson of the Ministry of Commerce, has clearly stressed that China will pay close attention to the follow-up developments of the European side, reserve the right to take necessary measures, and resolutely defend the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises.

Read on