When Trump said "America First," there was nothing to do with China or any other country.
Blinken's introduction of the concept of "co-management" is forced by the fact that China has "managed" the world and is "governing" the world, and the official language 1 is China's influence, 2 is China's global contribution to development, and 3 is China's contribution to the world economy.
The United States, which "proceeds from a position of strength," has finally discovered China's strength
And then? China and the United States jointly govern the world.
1. In the two wars between Russia and Ukraine and the Middle East, the United States will not end, and China will not take action;
2. The dollar and U.S. debt crisis is not only a matter of the United States, but also your Chinese finance, and I hope that China will endorse it.
The meaning of the Americans is therefore also very clear -
1. China don't help Russia, don't buy Iranian oil;
2. Raise the price of export commodities to cover the US dollar interest rate hike.
If so, there is Yellen's "overcapacity theory" in the past, and Blinken's "two-pipe theory" in the back - China and the United States are in charge of the world, and the United States is in charge of China.
So, Blinken's two speeches in the EU before boarding the plane and before boarding the plane, the first one was aggressive, the second was fierce, and the third was not a little timid? Are you sure?
The United States has finally put down its arrogance and changed one to two?
In fact, Blinken's "two-pronged theory" is not new.
Obama has previously proposed a G2 proposal between China and the United States -
1. The 2008 financial crisis in the United States was resolved with the help of China;
2. In 2010, China ranked first in manufacturing and second in GDP;
3. Obama proposed the G2 in 2011.
The proposer plays a leading role, that is, China and the United States govern the world, and then the United States governs China, that is, the "two-pronged theory".
What about China's reaction?
The modern version of the green plum boiled wine is a hero!
Sure enough, the "Obama-style warning" followed: if the Chinese lived the same life as the United States and the West, it would be a disaster.
When Chairman Mao won the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression in 1945 and Americans supported the Kuomintang in fighting the civil war, he took "discarding illusions and preparing for struggle" as his general policy, and saw the Sino-US relations at that time, in the future, and in the present!
Because Chairman Mao also wisely pointed out that "making trouble, failing, making trouble again, failing again, and then perishing, this is the logic of imperialism and all reactionaries." ”
What is the "two-pronged theory"?
It's nothing more than "troublemaking"!
Why the "two-pipe theory"?
Because of "failure, failure again"!
And then what?
Is China not doing a good job of national rejuvenation?
1. Do you "manage the world" with the Americans all day long? Or do you want to save the United States together?
2. Is it "the United States in charge of China"? Like the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, who destroyed its future and fantasized about throwing itself into the arms of the United States and the West?
No matter how cunning a fox is, it can't fight a good hunter
To do strategy, Blinken can't even finish elementary school-
1. Blinken's two-pronged theory exposes the greatest cowardice in American history. The United States, which has killed 4 second children, begged China to come out of the mountain?
2. At the critical moment when China-US relations are in the fission of the century, we accurately and keenly captured this message from the Americans, turning "mutual agreement" into "visiting by invitation", and giving Blinken a hint of response.
3. China and the United States have not yet reached the point of flipping the table and tearing their faces, and they do not necessarily have to get that, A and the two families do not have much feud, B China has no intention of replacing the United States, C economic and trade complementarity;
4. However, it harms the core interests of Chinese, abandons the unique path of China's development, and presses the pause button for China's national rejuvenation...... plus 10 Americans and 100 Blinken, all of them are arm blockers, and they can't do anything;
5. You can come, you can talk, there is room and space, and while giving the Americans time and opportunities, they are also striving for greater strategic initiative.
The problem, in fact, is not complicated, it is simpler than 1+1=2.
China, forced by the United States to become an all-round athlete, comparable to the Olympic heptathlon champion -
1. In 1992, after proposing the world's seven major strategic emerging industries, it has worked hard for 30 years and achieved 5 leading positions;
2. In the 2025 Made in China formulated in 2015, 36 all-around competition items were listed, and 35 were completed ahead of schedule this year.
China has won the battle of technological turnaround.
And is this just the beginning?
In 2010, China became the world's factory.
In 2025, Made in China will be created.
And then, is there anything going on with the Americans?
China's manufacturing to create, including the military industry, does not give priority to the development of national defense science and technology?
When Americans have nothing to do, they want to come out with something on the whole, something like provoking the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the likes of $2 unlimited interest hikes, and 3 their own homes are on fire and they are still pointing fingers at others like this, that, can't do anything, otherwise what will happen to you......
Toss, toss, toss;
忽悠,adhesive忽悠;
捣乱,adhesive捣乱......