In the past two days, Kailu County in Inner Mongolia was busy with spring farming, but the leaders of the town and village had arbitrarily obstructed the farmers from farming.
Loading...
What makes everyone angry the most is these faces
When the peasant households were busy cultivating the land, the village cadres came forward to stop them and demanded that they pay the fees, but the peasant households did not agree and asked rhetorically why they should pay the money after they had already paid it? The village cadres replied arrogantly: If the boss wants me to collect it, you will have to pay it.
The two sides were at a stalemate, and the farmers said that they could not let them cultivate the land first, and if they missed these days, they would miss the season, but the village cadres did not agree, insisting on paying the fees first, and leaving as soon as they paid the money.
This money is not a small amount of money, the cost of more than 900,000 yuan, the farmers hope that the village will let them complete the farming first, and the village cadres will be even tougher, and they also threaten to bring 200 people tomorrow to obstruct it.
After the deputy secretary of Kailu County arrived at the scene, he told the peasant households in righteous words: This land does not belong to you! You are encroaching on the land of the village collective!
What kind of encroachment is this? Even though they have paid the money and signed a contract, it is still 10 years before the contract expires, so how can it become that they have embezzled it? The peasant households cannot figure out how to do so.
According to the notice issued by the village to the farmer before, 200 yuan per mu of land should be paid, and the farmer's contract has contracted a total of 5,600 mu, which is more than 1 million.
The peasant households felt very aggrieved and said to the leaders who prevented them from farming: Is it unreasonable to have a contract that prevents them from farming? Do you have a court document?
Ji Yunhao, deputy secretary of the town, saw that this matter could not be solved, so he simply ordered someone to detain the farmer's car for cultivating the land!
Afterwards, the farmer went to the office to find him a theory, and the secretary also said: He himself does not know much about the law!
The key is that the words and attitudes of these leaders are very disgusting, and on April 23, the local authorities issued an announcement on the matter.
There are three main points:
1. The supplementary payment fee is reasonable and legal
2. Order that peasant households can no longer be obstructed from cultivating their land
3. Ji Yunhao, deputy secretary of the town, was dismissed, and the rest were punished to varying degrees.
The second and third points in the content of the report have been unanimously praised by netizens, but the first point says that the payment is legal and reasonable, and there is currently a lot of controversy on the Internet. In response to the controversy caused by the fermentation of public opinion, today, Kailu County issued an announcement again to explain the ins and outs of this matter, and we will discuss some of the key contents.
1. Emphasize that the contractor is not a villager of the village
Whether it is the household registration of the village or not, in fact, does not have much to do with this incident, and the current focus of public opinion is whether this money should be collected.
2. Emphasize that the contracting cost is very low in that year, 4 yuan per mu per year
The rent of 4 yuan per mu of land was indeed very cheap, but the farmers themselves said that this was saline-alkali land back then, and it was land that no one wanted in the village, so it was so cheap.
3. Mention of a change in the nature of land use
As of now, there is no complete contract on the Internet, so it is now clear what is the scope of use agreed in the contract, and this is the key factor in solving this case.
At the end of the announcement, it was emphasized that the contractor was agreed to increase the fee by 200 yuan, and at the same time, it was also specifically stated that the contractor had subleased part of the land to others for operation.
First of all, it was Zhang Mouzhu who agreed, not himself, these are two concepts, he didn't agree, he can be agreed?
Second, is there a stipulation in the contract that Zhang Mouzhu cannot sublease to others? This is very important, and it cannot be said that he has subleased, but it still depends on how it is agreed in the contract.
This is the legal basis listed in the Kailu County Bulletin.
Key points: What is the name of the basis for their listing? It is the plan, the opinion, and at the same time, the land for which the fee is charged is called the "pilot", and the reform work is carried out on a trial basis in combination with these key words and the guidance of the superiors.
Which of these words is a statute? Except for the civil code that they have listed, there is none.
According to the 533 articles they listed, there is such a sentence in it, unforeseeable major changes, can the contractor fatten the land foresee a greater economic value? Moreover, this regulation says that you should negotiate, and the negotiation will not lead to a lawsuit, and it does not say that you can use this law as a sword to enforce the law arbitrarily, right?
The mainland is a society governed by the rule of law, and there are many laws and regulations, but it is important to know that the guiding methods and plans cannot go beyond the law, and if there is a conflict between these so-called methods, plans and laws, the law shall prevail. As an administrative department, you should understand the law, and you must not have such a golden sentence as "I don't understand the law".
There are still many details in this case that the outside world does not know, especially the details of the contract, so whether the farmers will win the lawsuit in the end depends on the provisions of the contract and whether the plan of Kailu County has a clear legal basis, rather than simply throwing a so-called plan as the law to deal with the people.