With the large-scale sales of domestic mobile phones,The curved screen that was once only available in the flagship is now used by many thousand-yuan machines,What I want to talk about today are two cost-effective curved screen thousand-yuan machines,Redmi note13pro+andRealmeGTneo6se,Compare the parameters,See which curved screen is more worthy of consumers to buy。
First of all, look at the core CPU parameters,Redmi note13pro+It uses Dimensity7200ultra,This CPU can only be considered decent,The running score is close to 800,000 points,Daily use must be no problem;And the real meGTneo6se uses Qualcomm Snapdragon7+gen3,The running score is straight after Qualcomm Snapdragon8gen2,Close to 1.5 million points,It is twice that of Redmi note13pro+,There is no doubt that the performance of the real me is lighter。
Secondly, let's look at the two cameras,Xiaomi is a quad camera and the real me is a triple camera,Realme GTneo6se except for the front camera is higher than Redmi note13pro+,The others are not as good as Redmi note13pro+,Redmi note13pro+The rear 200 million pixel main camera is significantly ahead。
Let's take a look at the battery life of the two, the Redmi note13pro+ battery is 5000mah, with 120w fast charging, and the realme GTneo6se is 5500mah, with 100w fast charging, it can only be said that each has its own merits, and it is difficult to distinguish between them.
Since we talk about cost performance,Then we can't help but talk about the price,Redmi note13pro+(12+256version)At present, the official flagship store of Pinduoduo is only 1622 yuan,And the real meGTneo6se(12+256 version)At present, the cheapest official flagship store of Pinduoduo is also 1885 yuan,Slightly higher than Redmi note13pro+。
To sum up, if you are a game lover with higher requirements for mobile phone CPU performance and front photography, then choose Realme GTneo6se, if you have a limited budget and higher requirements for the rear camera, then buy Redmi note13pro+, in addition, Redmi note13pro+ also has the advantages of IP68 dust and water resistance that only flagship machines have, but both mobile phones are cost-effective.