The man went to a rental house to prostitute himself with illness, but when he was excited, he suddenly fell ill and died.
As a result, the man's family did not forgive the landlord on this matter.
even bluntly said that he was 90% responsible, and in the end, the lion opened his mouth and demanded a claim of 980,000!
So what did the court decide in the end?
The source of this article comes from the official media [Changsha Political and Legal "A man rented a house for prostitution and died of a sudden illness due to too much excitement. The family claimed more than 980,000 yuan], the specific link is repeated at the end of the article, but in order to improve the readability of the article, the details may be polished, please read sensibly, for reference only.
trade
On the same day, Luo received a call from the "trading woman" Zhu, asking him if he wanted to come over.
Luo, who was already excited, immediately went to Zhu's rental house.
Unexpectedly, at the moment when the two were passionate, Luo suddenly had a spirit, his body stiffened suddenly, and he fell to the ground with a "bang".
This made Zhu anxious, and in a panic, she actually called the landlord Hua.
Hua thought that the two had a normal relationship between men and women, and then kindly rescued Luo with Zhu.
The two of them were fed with water and slapped their backs hard, and they were rescued for seven or eight hours in a row.
In the middle, Luo's symptoms improved, and Zhu and Hua's hearts gradually fell, but who knows, soon Luo's face turned blue again, and this time no matter how the two operated, there was no improvement.
Therefore, the two dialed 110 and 119, but unfortunately, even though the ambulance arrived quickly, Luo still died because the rescue was not timely.
This sudden bad news caught Zhu and Hua off guard. Luo's family, who learned of the incident, was also shocked.
But what Zhu and Hua didn't expect was that Luo's family not only did not feel ashamed, but filed a lawsuit with the court.
accused Luo's death of being inseparable from Zhu and Hua, and demanded compensation of more than 980,000 yuan!
First instance and second instance
After hearing the case, the court quickly handed down its verdict:
Luo bears 90% of the main responsibility for his death, while Zhu bears 10% of the responsibility.
The landlord, Hua, had no direct connection with Luo's death and did not need to be held responsible.
However, Luo's family was not reconciled.
They insisted that Zhu was unwell and that the viruses and bacteria he carried might induce Luo to become ill.
Moreover, after Luo suddenly fell ill, Zhu and Hua did not call the police as soon as possible and called the emergency number at the critical moment when he was in urgent need of help, delaying the time for medical treatment, resulting in Luo's death.
Therefore, Zhu and Hua should bear 90% of the main responsibility, while Luo himself is only 10% responsible.
So with this in mind, Luo's family appealed to the court again.
This case, which should have come to an end, has once again become the object of trial by the court.
The focus of the dispute is whether Zhu and Hua have fulfilled their reasonable rescue obligations.
On the one hand, there are family members who have lost their loved ones and it is difficult to accept, and on the other hand, there are people involved in the case who are in prison and have an uncertain future.
The court needs to weigh the evidence again and give a convincing verdict to all parties.
再审
The forensic doctor conducted a detailed examination of Luo's body, and the results showed that Luo himself suffered from coronary heart disease, hypertension, etc., and his condition was serious.
Despite this, based on the "transaction" between Zhu and Luo, there is a special legal relationship between the two, and Zhu does have an obligation to rescue Luo.
However, based on Zhu's own education level and emergency response ability, the judge believed that she had taken first-aid measures within her ability at that time and fulfilled her due rescue obligations.
In contrast, Hua, as the landlord, has no direct legal relationship with Luo.
He has no special connection with Luo, and there is no causal relationship with his death, so in law, he has no obligation to help.
Therefore, there is nothing reasonable to blame Luo's death on Hua.
In the end, the court rejected the appeal of Luo's family and upheld the previous trial decision.
epilogue
The result of the trial is not only a lament for the loss of life, but also a demonstration of the fairness of the law itself.
Similarly, this incident has also sounded the alarm for all sectors of society:
Each of us should be vigilant and stay away from temptation. At the same time, you should also have the courage to take responsibility and lend a helping hand when others need help.
Only in this way can we build a safer, more orderly and more supportive society.
Bibliography:
[1] Changsha Political Science and Law 1 "A Man Renting a House for Prostitution, Died of a Sudden Illness Due to Too Excitement, Family Claims More Than 980,000 Yuan-Today's Headlines"