Loading...
Internet turmoil: Gao Junyu's account is full of turmoil
On April 24, the storm on the web was not limited to the change of weather in the spring. A group of netizens' sharp eyes were like falcons, and they quickly caught the abnormality of the @高君雨 account - whether it was Weibo or Douyin, the account display was banned or forbidden to follow.
Such sights are not uncommon in the online world, but if linked to previous events, they explain how today's storm is brewing. Not long ago, the title of "Reader Girl" swept the Internet, and Gao Junyu gained a lot of attention with her so-called surgery video, but the good times did not last long, and the problem of falsification of video time exploded like a thunderbolt from the sky, triggering widespread public discussion.
Loading...
Suspicion: The truth lies behind the video
The authenticity of the video content became the focus of discussion. In fact, netizens' spirit of inquiry and ability to detect on the Internet should not be underestimated. Some netizens with a detective spirit like Sherlock Holmes began to dig deep into the truth behind the video.
They quickly discovered that the timeline in the video did not match the time point mentioned by Gao Junyu, so doubts arose. As the investigation deepened, the video, which was advertised as a "live recording," turned out to be a "stock video."
The statement of the Yuhang District Internet Illegal and Adverse Information Reporting Center is like pouring cold water on the incident, giving everyone an outlet for their anger. is like the reversal plot of the TV series, Gao Junyu's trust has plummeted, and her online persona is like a dismantled Lego, scattered piece by piece.
Netizens collectively "opened their brains"
Loading...
When the incident gradually surfaced, the comment area of netizens became a stage for collective "brainstorming". Someone joked: "When I was a child, I lied to buy a learning machine, and when I grew up, I lied to my kind heart, is this the price of growth?" Behind the humorous words is the disappointment of integrity.
Someone else bluntly said: "One word 'should'!" This kind of direct and dramatic remark makes people laugh, and it also reflects the public's attitude towards this kind of online behavior - zero tolerance. Netizens' pursuit of authenticity is like treating food, once adulteration is discovered, it is a voice of doubt.
Voices on the other side: The black hand behind the scenes needs to be reviewed?
Just as the sound on one side reached its climax, the voice on the other side also began to exert force. Some netizens pointed the finger at the team behind all this. They asked: "One of her accounts is banned, but there are many more accounts that 'create' stories to trick people out of sympathy and make money." ”
This shifts the focus of the incident from a single individual to the entire chain of producing and disseminating disinformation. For this kind of behavior, the anger of netizens seems to have a more reasonable outlet. They demanded that if rectification is to be carried out, it should be rolled out in an all-round way, leaving no blind spots.
The rallying cry of controversy: The clarion call for rectification has been sounded
The development of events is as ups and downs as a script, making all the netizens who pay attention feel like they are on a roller coaster. From initial sympathy, to later anger, to now the calmness of examining the entire online environment, the public's emotions have been on a rollercoaster ride.
Netizens left their wisdom and humor in the comment area, some ridiculing and some thoughtful. They participate in the event in their own way, and they also influence the online environment around them with their own words. The interactive comment section became a brainstorming session, where netizens not only shared their opinions, but also exchanged emotions. And all this may be just the beginning of the reorganization of the network ecology.