If one person is okay to run in a blue T-shirt, but five people have to report the same T-shirt, then running is a violation or a fashion crime?
Are we encouraging healthy living, or are we putting obstacles in the way of them? Are these rules for safety, or are they simply causing trouble?
On the banks of the Huangpu River in Shanghai, a man and several of his colleagues got into a petty altercation with security guards.
Loading...
The small team wore blue T-shirts with the word "Shanghai" printed on the front and each held a small flag.
It's clearly a colleague from a company doing a team activity. The problem was that they were prevented from running by security guards because they had not reported it beforehand.
The cause of the incident sounded a bit ridiculous, and the man said that the security guards told them that it was not that they were not allowed to run, but that they needed to be notified beforehand.
The logic of the security guards is that it looks like an organized event due to their uniform attire.
The man tried to explain, pointing to his colleague and saying that although they were wearing the same clothes, it did not represent a premeditated collective action between them.
He even jokingly said that it was just a coincidence, everyone could buy such clothes, and it was a pure accident that they wore the same clothes.
He asked the security guard rhetorically, can't you run here just because several people are dressed the same? He challenged the security guard's logic and said that one person can run alone, but three people can't?
And questioned, what is called a "unified activity", is it defined as a "unified activity" just because he and his colleagues are running?
The man further questioned whether there was a rule in Shanghai and even in China as a whole that people wearing the same clothes could not run together.
Faced with this situation, his colleagues also seemed very helpless.
The man concluded by saying that this rule was ridiculous and that it seemed that they needed to be careful not to even buy clothes so as not to collide with others and prevent them from participating in certain activities.
In this discussion, we saw some interesting comments and contrasts
If people wearing the same clothes need to be reported when they gather together, then shouldn't delivery workers like Meituan be restricted from running around the streets every day?
If the security guards themselves are a group wearing uniform as well, should they also be self-restricted according to the same standards?
Although watching the video feels that some of the regulations are ridiculous, in fact, some of them are for safety reasons. he
The public gathering rules mentioned are actually to prevent the safety risks that may be brought about by disorderly gatherings.
Such provisions, while in some cases unreasonable, are intended to serve the larger public interest.
The man investigated further and consulted the relevant regulations
He found that the family outing's parent-child dress rule, if there were more than three people, would be considered an organized event, which was not allowed in some public places.
According to his understanding, it is no problem for a couple to travel in the same clothes, and it is equally okay to bring a child with them. However, once two children are brought along, uniform parent-child attire may be prohibited for the whole family.
The security guard on the Huangpu River in Shanghai may have been taking the regulations too seriously, or he may have misunderstood something, but this is not the point.
The outside world is celebrating diversity and individuality, but we here may have to report to the park because three people in the family wear the same T-shirts to the park, otherwise we organize an event. Isn't that a bit of a fuss?
How can there be such a reason? It's okay for a couple to wear a couple's outfit on the street, but if a family wears a parent-child outfit, it becomes a potential "illegal assembly"? This logic is too jumpy.
The man tried to explain it with common sense, but the security guard insisted on a seemingly inelastic explanation. The implementation of such rigid regulations not only did not solve the problem, but on the contrary increased the dissatisfaction and misunderstanding between the two sides.
True management should be flexible, reasonable, and able to distinguish between different situations, rather than one size fits all.
What we need is not to make citizens feel like they could step on a landmine at any moment, but to make everyone feel free and safe in public spaces.
Strictness is necessary, but more importantly reasonable. What we need is not "obeying me is maintaining order", but "understanding you and me to build harmony".
At last
In short, the enlightenment of this incident to us is that management must be warm, and the rules must also pay attention to human feelings. Don't let what should be a happy parent-child time turn into an "illegal activity" with the wrong clothes. This is not only a challenge to common sense, but also a disrespect to the emotions of ordinary people. We need to reflect on how to find a better balance between maintaining public safety and respecting individual freedoms.
What do you think?
#头条创作挑战赛#