The Kailu cultivated land incident is becoming more and more fermented on the Internet, and many people think that farmers are justified, but there are also some people who feel that it is not simple to contract 6,000 acres of land.
A total of 156,800, contracted for 30 years
According to this netizen's thinking, 156800 has been contracted for 30 years
The annual contract cost is 5,226 yuan.
If it is 110 acres of cultivated land, 47.50909091 yuan per mu.
If it is calculated according to the actual 5467 acres, then it is 9 cents per acre.
The total area is 6,000 acres, 413 acres of forest land and 110 acres of cultivated land. The rest is land that has been transformed by the farmers themselves.
One receipt is 60,000 yuan
The other receipt was 96,800 yuan, for a total of 156,800 yuan. In other words, 150,007 can be contracted for decades.
The contracted farmer also said that at that time, no one paid 5 yuan per mu, so the bargain price was 9 cents per mu. Contracting an acre of land for less than a dollar, this number is indeed thunderous,
So who took the money collected by the village at that time? Did it be in his own pocket or distributed it to the members of the village collective.
Is it illegal for farmers to change the nature of their land?
Do these farmers have the right to change the nature of the land?
Apparently not.
Their contract was for 110 acres of arable land, which was eventually expanded to 5,000 acres.
It is not a day's work for peasant households to change their land, and it is also changed after seeing the benefits
According to the farmers, they turned the original land into fertile land, and the yield of corn per mu was as high as 1,800 catties.
So in the past 20 years, it must have been slowly expanded, after all, the area is large, and it is also a taste of sweetness before investing heavily in transformation. The family invests one or two million, which also shows that they realize that the investment is also worth it and can return on their investment.
How much does the village cadre earn a year from 5,000 acres of land?
80 seeds, 200 fertilizers, 20 sowing, 60 irrigation, 40 pesticides, and 60 harvesting, 500 yuan per mu is enough.
The price of corn per catty is 1-1.3 yuan.
According to the average yield of 1600 catties per mu, the price is 1.2 yuan. 1600*1.2=1920
Net income per mu, 1920-500=1420
The annual income of 5000 mu is 1420*5000=7100000
Contracted for 30 years, counted as 20 years of harvest,
1420*5000*20=142000000
Nearly 140 million, they invested a lot of money to change the nature of the land, of course, they felt converted, but they didn't expect the people in the village to be unwilling.
The wasteland is uncultivated, and there are people fighting for it.
Seeing that their net income per mu of land is more than 1,400 yuan and the rent is one dollar, the village cadres must be psychologically unbalanced.
The contract stipulates that the cultivated land is only 110 acres, and it is clearly stipulated that the land use shall not be changed
The contract clearly states that it is for the construction of a dairy farm. Why did it become a farmer again? The original cultivated land was 110 acres, but now the cultivated land is 5,000 acres.
Article 6 of the contract stipulates that during the contract period, the nature and use of the land shall not be changed. Their use was to raise dairy cows, and finally expanded to 5,000 acres, and there was no application for changing the nature of the land.
Lawyers speak out, violating the criminal law
Unauthorized conversion to cultivated land is also the crime of illegal occupation of agricultural land, and there have been similar cases in Qinghai, and he was finally sentenced.
Organizations and individuals are not allowed to change the nature of the land. The Supreme Court Minister's voice is authoritative.
A number of lawyers also spoke out that the farmers were suspected of violating the law.
Even wasteland has clear legal provisions.
The lawyer said that an application must be made to change the land, and the villagers themselves invest in it, which does not mean that it is not illegal.
If the investment makes sense, and the developer recycles the farmland at a low price and changes the nature of the land, isn't it the same nature to build houses on it?
I don't think it's illegal, and I want to be rewarded!
It is not illegal to change it into fertile land, because many places are now changing saline-alkali land, and even subsidize thousands of yuan per mu of land, and Jilin even subsidizes 30,000 yuan per mu of land to improve saline-alkali land.
Their fast land is dry land, 15 acres per hectare, 510,000 subsidies, more than 30,000 per acre, if this is counted, these farmers should get 150 million rewards!
Gansu saline-alkali land subsidy of 3,000 yuan per acre, rent-free for 20 years.
The subsidy for saline-alkali land in Xinjiang is 1,000 yuan per mu.
Write to the end
Although the farmers have a considerable income, the people in the village should not be blushing.
When the end of their contract is up, it is also an asset for the descendants of the local villagers.
They did not ask for state subsidies, they were self-reliant, and changed the barren land into fertile land with a yield of 1,800 catties per acre. They are heroes. They shouldn't be bothered by their gains.
Why has this land been abandoned for decades, hundreds of years, or more, and no one has improved it?
After seeing other people's successful improvements, your eyes are red?
Latest follow-up
Farming has resumed, but the village has not relented.
It still costs 200 yuan per acre of land, and the subsequent court judgment will be passed. The village committee believes that the change in the nature of the land is illegal.
In the openness of government affairs, this matter is clarified, and this is the policy of 2018.
At the very least, it is still agricultural in nature, and as for how to deal with this matter in the end, it should take a while, but fortunately, the farmers have returned to normal farming.
I have something to say
I think that the village cadres are too short-sighted, and the success of peasant households in transforming their land is a blessing to the villagers! Even if some people do not enjoy the fruits now, when the peasant household contract expires, your children and grandchildren will receive 5,000 mu of fertile land, and they are the pioneers.
In some localities, they subsidize the improvement of saline-alkali land, and they are self-reliant, spending their own money and investing, and the harvest is also what they deserve!
Will it be like the lawyer said that the farmer violates the criminal law?
How do you think this matter will be judged in the end?
Do farmers have merit?
Please express your high opinion and discuss it together, there is no need to catch Ji Yunhao's remarks, after all, he is just a shield.