The whole network has been opened to protect rights and carry plagiarism reports
"Vanity Fair, different ways do not conspire with each other. "In the art examination room, candidates should focus on answering questions, not showing off their names; Schools should recruit students fairly, not become celebrity training centers. Behind the cheating turmoil in the art examination is the collision of discipline in the examination room and fair admissions.
Recently, a news of "5 million fans Internet celebrity cheating in the art exam" exploded on the Internet. It turned out that an Internet celebrity candidate reported his name in violation of the regulations during the re-examination of the Beijing Film Performance Major. Subsequently, Nortel decided to cancel the candidate's professional exam results.
However, the news then evolved into a heated discussion about the discipline and fairness of admissions in the Beijing Film Examination Room. Netizens questioned the school's handling methods: Is a small disciplinary violation worth making candidates lose a chance to go on to higher education? Among them, there is even more implicit dissatisfaction with the privileges of stars in the entertainment industry.
Indeed, examination discipline is related to the fairness and impartiality of the examination. If even the most basic disciplinary requirements are not followed, other candidates will lose their level playing field.
So, how should schools balance exam discipline with admissions fairness?
Distinguish the severity of disciplinary violations. Candidate violations can be classified as serious violations and minor violations. Serious violators should be given heavier penalties such as disqualification from the examination, while minor violations can be given relatively light punishments such as warnings.
Measure the impact of the violation on other test takers. If the fact of the violation does not affect the examination of other candidates, the punishment can be mitigated or reduced as appropriate.
Consider the subjective malice of the violation. If the candidate violates the rules in bad faith, he or she shall be punished in accordance with the regulations; If it is not intentional, education may be given on a case-by-case basis.
Pay attention to the right of appeal of the penalized candidates. The school should give the violating candidates the opportunity to present evidence, fully listen to the candidates' demands, and prevent improper punishment.
It should be pointed out that from the perspective of fair competition, Internet celebrity art candidates should not enjoy privileges. They, like other candidates, need to prove themselves through professional exams. If you condone the privilege of celebrities and the privileges of the second generation of stars, this is an injustice to all art candidates.
In the art examination room, candidates must abide by discipline, and the school must recruit students fairly. Only by taking both into account can the art examination return to its essence and achieve fairness and justice. This incident makes people reflect: what is the order of the examination room, what is the fairness of admissions? This needs to be maintained by everyone who participates in the art examination.
The whole network has been opened to protect rights and carry plagiarism reports