It's not who made the video, who is justified;
It's not that anyone is justified if they find a reporter to expose it;
It's not that anyone is justified under the banner of peasants;
Recently, cadres in Kailu County, Inner Mongolia, blocked farmers' spring ploughing, and there was a lot of speculation on the Internet.
Netizens who do not know the truth condemn the government's actions one-sidedly, and village and town cadres have simply and brutally enforced the law when implementing relevant policies.
For this reason, the three cadres involved have been seriously dealt with by the local government, and have been dismissed from their posts and given warnings by the party, and they have also paid the price for their inappropriate words and deeds.
But on the matter, this matter is not as simple as netizens speculated, and many deep-seated problems involve the implementation and promotion of the national land policy, which is the fundamental problem.
If everyone, like these farmers, openly resists the new policies implemented by the state's "Third National Land Survey" and bases their personal interests on the basis of harming the collective interests of the state, what patriotic dedication can we talk about?
The reason why Xiaobian said that a few large planters who refused to pay the "new land contract fee" as "farmers" is based on facts.
First, how many peasant households have the strength to contract 4,650 mu of land? According to their own statements, 10,000 yuan per mu is invested in improving the soil, and 4,650 mu is 46.5 million yuan.
It is estimated that ordinary peasant families will not be able to come up with even 100,000 yuan. It shows that these so-called peasants who often contract thousands of acres of land are already genuine farmers, and even have the blessing of capital behind them, all in order to take advantage of policy loopholes and maximize the benefits of capital.
Second, if such "farmers" are still called farmers, should those entrepreneurs engaged in industrial manufacturing be called "workers"?
These farmers, their status is like the contracted land, from "meadows" to "irrigated land", so I say that they are not farmers at all, but farmers with the blessing of capital behind them.
Another key point is that the contract signed with the village collective has changed its actual use.
It can also be seen on the front page of the exposed contract that the reason for the original contract was "to contract the barren swamp meadow for the construction of a dairy farm", that is, this large area of land can only be planted with grass to feed cattle and sheep and other livestock.
This is also in line with the grassland protection policy in Inner Mongolia, which is clearly stipulated in the National Grassland Law, and it is illegal and criminal to reclaim grassland as cultivated land without policy approval.
In the current environment is getting worse and worse, the grassland of Inner Mongolia, as a natural barrier in the north, should take grass planting and breeding as its own responsibility. Instead of cultivating the land without permission, turning the grassland into arable land.
Xiaobian saw that the contract clearly stated that the grassland was written, and the large planters did not have the right to change the nature of the land, and the change of the nature must be agreed by the villagers collectively before signing the contract again, and the contract price of grassland is very different from the price of irrigated land.
Obviously, these farmers still want to grow corn and other grain crops that can produce huge economic benefits at the extremely low price of 20 yuan per mu contracted by meadows in those days.
At present, the contract of irrigated land in the northern region is about 1,000 yuan per mu. The government levies 200 yuan per mu, which has taken into account the farmers' investment in improving the land in the early stage.
The small calculation of these farmers is that they still want to turn these cultivated lands that have been turned into irrigated land into their own "black household" land, and openly contradict the division of newly cultivated land area established by the "Third National Land Survey."
In the past, many people in these places were privately reclaimed and were not included in the national land pool, but now the state has begun to deal with these "black lands" in order to ensure national food security and the red line of 1.8 billion mu of cultivated land, which can be effectively implemented.
Since the local authorities have not held these farmers accountable for privately cultivating grassland for irrigation, and have also "regularized" these lands, it is only natural that the government will charge a certain amount of reasonable land contract fees in accordance with the policy of adding new land.
By the time of the third survey, these farmers had taken advantage of the state and made huge profits. Don't listen to the words of these farmers, what has taken 20 years of investment, and has not yet made a profit, etc.?
What kind of land needs 20 years to improve, are all ignorant netizens. If you were from his point of view, you would say the same. There is no profit and it is not early, it is all for their own selfish interests, thinking that the country's advantage is not taken advantage of, maybe it is only Xiao Luo Luo who shows up, and it is the capital behind it.
The most important thing is that these additional land supplementary contract fees will eventually be handed over to the state treasury, do we want to watch the national interests be encroached upon by these farmers?
Therefore, Xiaobian supports that the land belongs to the state, and the farmer must pay the contract fee in accordance with the national land policy, so that our treasury will be more and more full, and it is also the duty of every citizen to win the first opportunity for the country in the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea in the future!