Ji Yunhao is right, but his behavior is just rude.
According to the original contract, it was clearly stated that the original land was a barren marsh (5,600 acres of total land, only 110 acres of arable land) and was used to build a dairy farm. However, the contractor later expanded the cultivated area to 4,650 mu (about 80% of the total land area), which was equivalent to changing the nature and use of the land (barren marsh to cultivated land), which was a breach of the contract.
Perhaps, the contractor's act of clearing the land not only violates the civil and commercial law, but also violates the criminal law (the court judgment is required after the prosecution), and the contract should be annulled, and may even be sentenced.
If the criminal liability is not pursued, but the contractor still wants to continue farming, then it will pay an additional 200 yuan/mu contract fee, which is equivalent to a new contract.
However, it was farming season, and the contractor said that he could not come up with that much money, and there were objections and reluctance. Front-line administrators can only go down to the ground to block, so the conflict is triggered.
So, so far, whether the contractor has violated the relevant laws should be sued and let the court deal with it.
Helplessly, the county government did not explain clearly, and the rough work of the town cadres and village cadres must have caused people's dissatisfaction and caused even greater confusion.
