Iran, which does not have GPS, why does it hit the target accurately, is Beidou helping?

Although Israel has tried to weaken Iran's military capabilities by turning off GPS signal support, Iran has demonstrated remarkable strength. Their missiles were still able to accurately hit their intended targets during a flight of up to 2,000 kilometers, which undoubtedly proves Iran's high level of missile technology. What is even more astonishing is that these missiles are able to carry out the so-called S-shaped maneuver when performing tasks, and have shown excellent maneuverability. It is rumored that the missile can also make extreme actions such as rising and rushing down during the fall, and its hit accuracy has reached an astonishing meter level. Although we do not yet know the detailed technical parameters and operating principles of this missile, from the information that is known, Iran's missile technology has made great progress, which undoubtedly brings new challenges to the regional security situation.

Today we are going to focus on Iran, which bombed Israel for the first time from its own soil, a move that sent shockwaves around the world. Not only has Iran demonstrated astonishing precision, but it has also demonstrated its formidable regional influence by joining forces with three countries: Yemen, Iraq, and Syria. Such a strength that only Iran can possess, is not only demonstrating its resolve to the people at home, but also asserting its leadership to the entire Arab world.

Regarding the problem that the bomb caused a smaller hole than expected, it has been suggested that this may be due to Iran's reduction in the amount of ammunition. I suspect that Iran may have some reason to think that it does not want to cause too much damage. In fact, China is one of those persuaders, hoping that Iran will control the scale of the operation and avoid giving Israel a pretext to retaliate. The United States has also urgently communicated with China and expressed concern about the situation.

Iran, the great Persian nation, carefully planned the operation after weighing all the pros and cons. They crave revenge, but at the same time must ensure precision in their actions and control over their damage. It was a well-planned show that both showcased Iran's strength and avoided an unnecessary escalation of the conflict as much as possible.

Later, rumors began to circulate that the United States was actively seeking to get in touch with Iran and try to hold in-depth consultations with Israel. The Israelis have made it clear that while they will not launch a direct counterattack against Iran, this in no way means that they will sit idly by. Countries like Israel, which have always been known for their tenacity and vindictiveness, believe that they will not rest on their laurels. Of course, they will not opt for a high-risk operation such as an air strike on Iran, but they may resort to other, more subtle and subtle means, such as conducting targeted assassinations or causing some trouble in sensitive areas such as Lebanon. After all, Israel's retaliation has always been so varied that it is impossible to guard against.

What attracts people's attention is that at the news conference, US security spokesman Kirby made a rather eye-catching statement. He claimed that Iran did not really hit Israel, but was able to intercept it thanks to a joint operation of the United States and Israel. This claim has sparked widespread discussion around the world, after all, Iran is known to be the initiator of this action against Israel. Kirby's remarks seem to be deliberately evading this fact, which is quite intriguing.

Kirby further hinted that Israel could suffer even more losses without U.S. assistance, which seems to be questioning Israel's own military capabilities. His suggestion that Israel is not as powerful as the outside world thinks undoubtedly casts a shadow over Israel's international image.

What is even more surprising is that Kirby also revealed that most of Israel's missiles are imported from the United States, including the high-profile Iron Hammer missile, which is also made by the United States, and due to the time constraints on transporting missiles from the United States, Israel may not be able to obtain the required missile support in time in some cases.

Iran's choice to use drones and missiles is mainly due to the distance of more than a thousand kilometers between them and Israel. Rockets are not effective against Israel due to their limited range, so Iran has adopted this countermeasure model, which is both a tactical option and a strong deterrent, and I personally think that Iranian propaganda may be exaggerated in some respects. For example, they claim that the cost of a missile is only 3 million yuan, which seems unlikely in reality.

As for Israel's shutdown of Iran's GPS signal support, this is mainly due to security concerns. GPS signals have a wide range of applications in the military field, especially for missile and drone navigation and positioning. Fearing that Iran could use these high-precision navigation tools to launch an attack, Israel decided to turn off GPS signal support for Iran, with the aim of weakening its superiority in navigation and positioning, thereby ensuring the security of the country. This move undoubtedly demonstrates Israel's determination and determination in dealing with potential threats.

This move undoubtedly provides additional guarantees for Israel's security, but at the same time weakens Iran's combat effectiveness. Although Israel has decided to turn off support for GPS signals from Iran in an attempt to weaken its adversaries by cutting off this key means of navigation, Iran is not holding back its opponents. They turned to other navigation and positioning technologies, such as advanced inertial navigation systems, which accurately measure acceleration and angular velocity to infer their exact position and attitude in complex environments.

In addition, Iran has made flexible use of ground base stations and satellite communications to ensure that accurate location information can be obtained. With the aid of maps, radar, and other sensors, they are still able to navigate and locate effectively, and while turning off GPS signal support is a constraint on Iran's navigation capabilities, it is far from completely preventing it from accurately navigating and locating. This is a good demonstration of Iran's flexibility and ability to innovate in the face of external pressure.

Iran has demonstrated a high level of technology and flexibility in navigation and positioning, and despite facing some external constraints and challenges, they are still able to carry out effective navigation and positioning by various means, however, there is still some speculation and uncertainty about the specific details of how Iran uses various navigation systems for missile guidance, and more evidence and information are needed to confirm it.