laitimes

Strange logic: why can workers be laid off in the past, but teachers can't be laid off now?

author:Zion Torch

Due to the inevitability of social development, it is imperative for public teachers to be established and teachers to withdraw from the mechanism. Of course, for this historical inevitability, many unscrupulous teachers in primary and secondary schools disagree: some began to fantasize about small class systems, and some believed that they had a system, in short, all kinds of absurd remarks by teachers also exposed a very embarrassing reality: that is, contemporary teachers are too ignorant, counting on this group of animals to educate the next generation, there is a high probability of educating a group of waste.

Strange logic: why can workers be laid off in the past, but teachers can't be laid off now?

In fact, on the topic of teachers not being laid off, many righteous people said: Why can workers be laid off in the past, but now teachers can't be laid off?

Next, this expert will analyze the mentality of teachers.

1. Feel good about yourself

Many teachers and teachers' lackeys (some soft-headed parents) believe that workers should be laid off back then, and the fundamental reason why teachers cannot be laid off is that teachers do not belong to ordinary laborers, but to intellectuals and elites, so that workers can be laid off and peasants can starve, but teachers must eat and fish in the era of famine. In fact, this kind of psychology is seriously deformed, and it is also a manifestation of not recognizing reality.

Strange logic: why can workers be laid off in the past, but teachers can't be laid off now?

Because even in the era when workers were laid off, there were actually many undergraduates, junior college students and secondary school students among the laid-off workers of state-owned enterprises. You must know that from the perspective of scarcity, in the era of laid-off workers, the scarcity of college students is higher than that of doctoral students now. Therefore, in that era, there were also elites who were laid off (assuming that a university was considered an elite). Therefore, if teachers do not think of themselves as laborers, but fantasize about themselves as elites, they should not imagine that they can avoid the teacher exit mechanism that should come.

What's more, in the current era of university enrollment, what kind of elite are you? Many teachers look down on the construction workers on the construction site. However, many of the construction workers and cost workers on the construction site also have full-time undergraduate diplomas, and their academic qualifications are not worse than yours.

Speaking of the academic qualifications of teachers and construction workers, this expert remembers a dumb and laughable thing: a few years ago, this expert said that many of the construction workers and supervisors on the construction site also have full-time undergraduate degrees, so teachers should not find a sense of superiority from them, let alone look down on them. However, some self-proclaimed constructors actually left a message to this expert, asking, "Our constructor recruited you to provoke you" -- in fact, in the words of this expert, it seems that he has been fighting for the due social status of the constructor, right? So I judge that this self-proclaimed constructor is actually a teacher's lackey.

2. Cover your ears and steal the bell

Of course, in the face of the teacher's exit mechanism, teachers are often good at covering their ears and stealing the bell, and the typical speech technique is to have a set and can be a small class system. As for the small class system, it is even more nonsense: In any country in the world, the cost of the small class system is extremely high, so most private schools only engage in small class systems, and public schools are supported by taxpayers' taxes, so it is impossible to have a small class system -- after all, if they start to practice a small class system in order to feed the teachers, this cost is something that many areas cannot afford to bear.

Strange logic: why can workers be laid off in the past, but teachers can't be laid off now?

Judging from the small class size of teachers' fantasies, it is not difficult to see that most teachers are very Luthic in their thinking.

3. Is the teacher sacred?

After a series of failures, many teachers will say that if teachers do not have staff, they will not be able to educate students with peace of mind, and then students will suffer. But millions of new undergraduates every year, even if they are not hired, at half of the current salary of livestock teachers, they will break their heads to become teachers—after all, many regions need to go through the back door if they want to teach as a substitute teacher. Therefore, teachers should not fantasize about holding students hostage and scaring people.

In fact, teaching is not a sacred profession. In the 1990s, it was not uncommon for teachers to become escorts after being laid off. The difference between the so-called teacher and the escort girl in that era was just good or bad luck. Nowadays, the enrollment of master's students is constantly expanding, and many female students may sit on the stage as a junior during school, and after graduation, they will take the examination as a teacher, and they will be the same as teachers, and there is no sacredness at all.

Therefore, escorts and teachers are actually convertible, and there is no need to imagine too sacred.