Recently, Shenzhen has adopted strict restrictions on the issue of personal electric vehicles, while at the same time launching large-scale shared electric vehicles, which has caused widespread controversy. It is understood that a large number of different brands of shared electric vehicles have appeared on the roads of Shenzhen for a time, but the problems and challenges brought by it cannot be ignored. This article will analyze this initiative from three perspectives: public resource protection, business operation, and user experience.
From the perspective of the use of road resources, Shenzhen, as a big city, has relatively tight road conditions, both private electric vehicles occupy the road, and pour out tens of thousands of shared electric vehicles, which will undoubtedly cause greater pressure on urban traffic. According to statistics, the shared electric vehicles that have been parked on the sidewalks in some areas of Shenzhen occupy nearly 1/3 of the space, causing inconvenience to pedestrians. There are even comments that this move is essentially an individual problem to an overall problem, and the substitution is not sufficient.
From the perspective of enterprise operation, although the development potential of the sharing economy is huge, many shared electric vehicle companies do not seem to give sufficient consideration to the user experience in the early stage of promotion. Some users have reported that due to improper setting of rental prices and limited scope of use, embarrassing situations such as "power outage" are prone to occur during the journey, and the actual use efficiency is not high. Some users questioned that enterprises attach importance to advertising and resource competition, while ignoring the details of products and services, which is difficult to truly facilitate public travel.
From the perspective of personal user experience, although sharing electric vehicles can bring certain convenience, many problems also affect the satisfaction of use. The bulky body is not suitable for the elderly and people with reduced mobility, the cumbersome inspection process hinders efficiency, and the price is too high to replace taxis. In addition, due to the unclear use standards, it is easy to produce illegal parking chaos, which brings certain difficulties to community management.
Netizens are hotly discussed
Netizens said: Sharing electric vehicles is safe! Capital is really evil! It is already difficult for the people to be difficult!
Netizens said: It's normal! Roadside parking: Free affects road safety, and there is no to charge.
Netizens said: This batch of shared electric vehicles doesn't seem to be licensed, there is a high probability that there is no insurance, and there is no guarantee in case of an accident when riding it.
Netizens said: I basically don't use shared bicycles now, originally to facilitate myself, but as a result, I looked for parking places everywhere and became a service for it.
Netizens said: Checking electric vehicles is to clean up the capitalists and achieve the goal of monopoly.
Write at the end
Before the large-scale implementation of shared mobility, the government and enterprises need to further study and optimize. The first is to consider reducing the total amount and giving priority to meeting the travel needs of key areas; the second is to improve legal norms and clarify the rules and standards for use; the third is to support enterprises to improve their products and services and truly make users barrier-free and convenient to use; and the fourth is to take a long-term view and make overall plans for travel resources and coordinate various transportation needs. The development of the sharing economy should not become a new source of problems, but should give full play to its intrinsic value in promoting sustainable urban development.
In short, the sharing of electric vehicles is convenient for people, but there are also many potential problems to be solved. Shenzhen's move should improve its products and services in a nuanced manner, while leaving plenty of room for policy adjustments. Only by straightening out the relationship between all parties and truly maximizing the advantages of the sharing economy can we provide more efficient travel options for urban residents. The problem is not the introduction of the model, but how to plan and implement it carefully and thoughtfully, so that the new model can also make new contributions to social progress.
What do you think about this matter? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss